Monday, October 3, 2011


Dan Carter, New Zealand All-Blacks, Rugby World Cup 2011

by Dick of All Dicks & Poli Tico

Being liberal doesn't mean you don't have taste. Diversity doesn't mean you swallow everything. When you say don't judge, it doesn't mean you're not capable of nausea. When something makes one vomit, even a simple-minded liberal shouldn't swallow it.

Foremost, being liberal doesn't mean you should be simple-minded, content in trying to impress innocently with all the hackneyed dogmas-of-the-moment just to be "in".

I spend an average of not even an hour per week with this blog. Thirty to forty minutes to write & send the article to the poster, then five minutes maximum to check the blog a few days later when it's already posted (the poster takes only 15 minutes to post). Then I forget about it until I'm reminded again. Just a perfunctory less than an hour-long semi-psychological confrontation session packaged as sport beefcake, a seemingly simple but actually a tri-continental effort of friends. I'm mostly writing about a receding world & forgotten tastes, totally irrelevant from my current & future realities. A world overtaken (& ultimately could be overwritten) by political, economic & cultural realities which would be Greek today to one prone to wishful thinking (I've written about all these before, & also about wishful thinking). In times of sectoral revolutions, all the sacrifices are, by necessity, glorious. Sex with a B-lister gay could be delicious if seen from the prism of supreme sacrifice. Could even be a beautiful delusion. But I was never into swallowing my vomit even with the pretext of supreme sacrifice, much less delusion. No need to wage revolutions when I enjoyed all the straight guys I had sex with. Been there, done that. Now ahead are the best parts of my heterosexual life.

I made it so I have no appetite for insincere political excuses, much more to self-righteous compassion. I never had sex out of mercy. Nobody in his right mind does. You just have to deal with life squarely, & not pretend - worse, impose - when you're lacking. The world is reeling as it is from accommodating more than what it could chew. Frankly, the Western part is about to do some vomiting of its own in no time as a result.

I write about what first comes to mind the moment I sipped my first espresso in my desk. I have 30 news apps in 8 languages in my tablet (the 8th is Russian, I learned it faster than Arabic, my future 9th language). The germ of an idea I would pick from the language of the day. Azzuri day. I picked out our first topic for today from Turin's La Stampa & Milan's Corriere della Sera.

In Italy, a gay group has publicly "outed" online ten supposedly homosexual politicians who helped defeat an anti-homophobia measure in the Italian Parliament. The list was allegedly posted from California (hmm, exporting bad taste...). Where did they get the idea that just because one loves fellatio, he should identify with them & he is one of them? For a long time, I've often read reams of claims from various gay groups that such & such historical figures were gay & they instantly became fodders to gay propaganda. So? If Shakespeare was gay, the fairy hairdresser is sexy? For all they know, these politicians & historical figures only loved straight guys & would vomit just imagining any part of the gay anatomy, & in no way wanted to identify with any gay. When Merv Griffin died & it was gossiped he was a closet case, he was condemned posthumously for allegedly not coming out & not fighting for gays who claimed him immediately as their own even without his ghost's permission. Funny, but how about some people having some humility, accept what they could never be, not fantasize on how they would never be & not aggravate those who just wanted to maintain the high quality of their sex lives. There are millions of ugly people, many of them commit suicide because of depression about their unsightly fate & face, but they don't harangue ugly movie producers when only the beautiful ones are chosen for the leading parts. What makes being a sexual deviant who couldn't hide his deviance be an excuse for politically blackmailing others to throw away their usual high standards of taste &, worse, identify as one with poor taste? I only find homophobia wrong if it is used for unprovoked aggression but sexually, it's another matter, everybody actually has a right to preserve his good taste. I might have loved sex with straight guys in the past but I've punched more than a hundred gays trying to take advantage. I was never into fake Rolex or fake Louis Vuitton, no way would I have had sex with a not genuine man. I actually vomited all over his face when one tried to get too close in seducing me. Religion or bigotry isn't the prime reason why B-lister gays have been sidelined for thousands of years- it's basic good taste & sensibility. As my British friend Ewan said, just like the ugly ones, they really aren't comfortable in the first place to be with, much less have sex with, so why all these artificial efforts to abuse the political system to turn them into something they could never be? Stonewall is ancient history & it was a different battlefield altogether. Now, most are no longer fighting for the right to have sex, but the right to have DELICIOUS sex & a nice view to go with it. Perhaps it's only 'revolutionary' fervor which benumbed the senses of some & gave them the strong stomachs to tolerate each other. Otherwise, just like the Soviets, who for a long time deluded themselves that tightening their belts was utopia, they would eventually get tired fooling themselves, regain their sanity in time & finally eat right.

You simply don't force food into the mouths of people when all they wanted was to vomit. Laws couldn't do that. If people get confused at a particularly low point, saner climes will reverse it anyway. Or the foolish civilization could simply be swept away by wiser & classier ones. History already did that many times for thousands of years.

Don't use the young ones as pretext. They are supposed to be being given role models. Note, most of these "models" did it when they were about to retire, after they've won their contests, after they have their hit, after they have become Supreme Court justices, etc. Give ideas of "coming out" to an innocent even before he reached anything & he won't reach anything, ending up as just another fag in the neighborhood. If ever, the recent result in the British census that only 1% of the British now identify as gay even after decades of lapping up gay superstars & losing billions on out gay soldier-reinforced platoons which couldn't beat mere guerrillas in Afghanistan, is a prime portrait of the stark reality on the ground. Whoever invented this hare-brained idea of "coming out" of those who could otherwise hack it just to validate the existence of those who couldn't? It turned out now it was just to sacrifice those who could for those who couldn't, while degrading the taste & sensibilities of everyone else. Will they ever, ever be validated anyway in the first place? Where are the other 9%? Has it occurred to any propagandist they might have just made it, are happy, contented, & are even more successful than any of those role models. Merv Griffin made it. X made it, so has Y, so has Z. Ewan made it.

I made it.

It's best to just write-off the noise. Correction, amplified whine. What is needed is just a localized charity case & not one where you have to degrade the quality of the culture just to pamper anyone, & provide opportunistic platforms to hypocrite grandstanders so they could pretend being modern & compassionate to prevent themselves from staring at their own deficiencies (note the compensatory personalities involved). 1% of the population shouldn't be in the business of diluting the taste of the 99%. Most men into men know how to enjoy their sex lives even without swallowing their vomits or weakening their world. Britain recently upheld its good taste. As history shows, taste eventually prevails despite intervening corny episodes. Things are again finally looking up, but still, we can't escape from more pressing questions: we are at a juncture when civilizations could change, how can NATO win over China when they couldn't even be decisive in Afghanistan? Note, these countries controlled the world when they didn't speak the word "gay" in the same sentence with "military". Coincidence? Of course, gays have always been in the military, that's where the boys are after all (Hillcrest in San Diego has always thrived). But what happens to the psyche of those involved when something "anathema"(to use an uncontroversial word) to a prevailing close culture is brought out into the open as part of the system? Was it a concidence the Dutch soldiers balked from preventing a massacre in Bosnia, the Talibans running rings around the hi-tech equipments of NATO, the Europeans taking 7 months & still not succeeding to neutralize Qaddaffi, etc? Something in the current military culture makes them weak at the knees seeing all those sexy swarthy Afghan men that they couldn't shoot right?

Or just another residual of the culture of blind acceptance of the fantasies of supposed-to-be-modern enlightened minds that at one time enthralled adulating sheeps AKA mouth-agape believers with the power of other so-called revolutionizing modern ideas like Communism, Hippie, derivatives, leveraged mortgages, Eurozone ... in short, magical thinking?

Meanwhile, the New York economist Nouriel Robbini, the so-called "Dr. Doom" who predicted the 2008 recession, just pronounced the "double-dip" recession in the West has already started its second dip. At the same time, China grew 10% in the last quarter, its income in PPP terms is already 75% that of the US (it was puny just a decade ago), it holds nearly $4 trillion in reserves while the US has $13 trillion in debts. In Europe, more red ink & uncertainty, & they're still debating what to do. Mere recession? Not the usual when the alternative to the system & culture is growing steadily to overwhelming proportions. In 2030, it is expected to be double that of the US. Who would believe all the democratic pretensions if the West loses out despite all the nicely written theories? It would take only a wily political operator to say:"Look where democracy brought us!"

The last resort. War?

You hear in gay propaganda there were gays even in Alexander's army. There were even gay emperors in the Roman Empire. Precisely. They eventually lost, & now they're history.

Don't judge the article now. Save it & read it again after ten years.


There's a friendly competition with our poster, he now also speaks English, Dutch, German, Italian, Spanish, French, & he's now also learning Russian, lol. I have to hurry up my Arabic. Nobody wants to be beaten in the group, intellectually or sexually. We have plans to publish daily again. I'm just waiting for the result of the next sexual conversion therapy of my friend Greg (Homophobic Chic) which may start January, 2012. We'd like to convert him at least to bisexuality before we pump up the engine. We don't want him to be outgrown by the blog. Our poster, Poli, with his frequently hacked email ads & bots in his tablet (LOL, he's not hiding, folks), has prepared a plan where we'll be more bisexually focused, a celebration of straight sexy sports of both sexes, with likely versions in French, Italian & Spanish (though more on male because Delilah now controls the pictures). It won't be a mere scrapbook blog anymore. We'll be publishing original materials. All in hi-res. For free. You'll see.

So, Greg. Toughen up, dude! Be a man!

Henry Chavancy, Maxime Mermoz, Aurelien Rougerie, Alexis Palisson, Thierry Dusautoir