Wednesday, August 24, 2011

SEXY BRITAIN, After The Hard-Sell of Wishful Thinking

Conventional wisdom is, well, another straw to clutch on in the winds of wishful thinking. One of the big fantasies in gay propaganda is that society is unaware of the gays so massive promotions must be done. But who has lived in any neighborhood without gay people & those gossiped as suspects? Who has gone to any school without a gay professor, gay classmate & those gossiped as suspects? Who doesn't have a delicate co-worker who always suddenly appear beside you whenever you are in the urinal & again others gossiped as suspects? The expectation was if gays were exposed & treated like rock stars in primetime, they will be accepted like one in time. It turned out, quite the opposite. In Britain (suddenly a very sexy place these days), they did a census last year & it turned out only 1% now are actually willing to label themselves as gay in the wake of the great gay promotions. It rebuffed, instead of recruiting for the cause (some gay groups are actually scaling down the 10% they used in their propaganda to save face). What's remarkable was it happened in a society which is the most liberal sexually in the English-speaking world & whose media was virtually saturated by gay propaganda for decades. Something amiss why it didn't click? It appears now it's like promoting a product that won't sell. One wonders if B-lister gays were better off left to sashay all they wanted in the shadows instead.

I learned of the survey results when Ewan suddenly called up very cheerfully one day. My British friend Ewan is 6'3", blue eyes & looks like a young aristocrat cross between Sean Connery & Pierce Brosnan. He publicly identifies as straight, intends to marry a woman & form a normal family eventually but he loves sucking straight lads ONLY for the meantime (he discovered delicious cocks in Oxford). He finds it laughable, like I did, that he has to come out & identify with people who just happened to share his love for sucking a cock but which he isn't even comfortable socializing with, much less defining his life with. The bottomline for him is people just be given the space to do their thing sexually- something which men who are into men enjoy now (even better if enjoyed far from known gay hang-outs because the gay tones just destroy the illusion). But for these people to be bestowed with inappropriate cultural visibility is an entirely different thing because they really aren't comfortable to be with in the first place & it's the height of artificiality to impose social & cultural codes of behavior around them & make them into something more physically & emotionally "acceptable" than they really are. For Ewan, their effects are better when only the fruits of their imaginations are seen because their real selves aren't quite as comfortably spectacular as the products of their alienation despite the gym & the skin cleansers. Ewan, like me, see it more as similar to the case of a handsome guy who avoids an ugly girl. Do you think he'll kiss the girl just because she screams "Bigot" or "Ugli-phobic" to him? There's something icky when the negative antonyms (gays & ugly girls as opposed to straight men & beautiful girls) are forced, thru political actions, to be converted ridiculously into something they could never be. Just because Ewan sucks cocks doesn't mean he'll suck gay cocks just because they threatened to commit suicide. All kinds of people commit suicide due to varying reasons, why should he lower his sexual standards just to placate one kind? All kinds of people are bullied for many reasons, why hypocritically single out on gay bullying when you can censure the act of bullying for any cause instead? Making them special projects just encourage the B-listers to prance where they're better off not prancing
because everybody else has as much right to have a better view. Why should Ewan be censured publicly as homophobic just because he's not hiding the fact he abhors gays who insist on being sexual attractions, what about his right to enjoy only beautiful & delicious things? For him, sexually they really don't matter an iota at all. The drama is bandied as a fight for rights but it's more a blatant attempt to dilute the pleasure standards of a sector which no doubt will always be marginalized because, as it is coming out now, they repel more than they attract even among men who are into men themselves. 1% is indeed a very lonely, & irrelevant, number.

30% are people with color so you pay attention. But will you create social conflict & mess around your institutions like marriage just to pander to the caprice of 1%? I don't believe in naming gay civil unions as marriage for many reasons, foremost is you'll just be aggravating yourself by wasting more energy formulating explanations that John got married not to a woman but to Fred. Why not just invent another term for gay marriage like "strong-stomaching", for example: John got "strong-stomached" with Fred because he could stomach having sex with him. More practical, closer to the truth. Because many men who are into men, like Ewan now & me before, couldn't stomach having sex with the likes of either Fred or John, & we actually still find it more sensible to marry a woman & raise a normal family instead. Because we can. Only 1% are just being stubbornly over-acting when it's better off they just have their tantrums in a corner & not aggravate everybody else. The good thing is, if it's only 1% in Britain, it must be even more delicious now in places with lower nausea level like America. Times are a-changin'. Would it be nice to have a temporary relapse & enjoy the new scenery? No luck. Unfortunately, I'm hooked to vaginas already.

Delicious Spain, Aun Delicioso, Despite Pretentious Zapatero

El Mundo: Jose Maria Manzanarez

Spain is one of those European countries which might default any minute now. It has an unbelievable 40% unemployment among its youth population. Its unpopular Prime Minister, Zapatero (I don't even bother knowing his first name), is a pretentious self-styled progressive leader who vigorously postured as champion of social justice as if he invented the term- he found it more important to push through the capricious B-lister gay agenda over & above more serious projects which could have saved the majority of his countrymen from extreme hardships now. He cheapened the sexy Spanish macho soul, now he destroyed them physically with economic depression. He blames the world economic crisis for his woes, dishonestly forgetting that his country is the only European country with leaders stupid enough to create such an unbelievable level of unemployment. The problem with pretentious democracy Spanish-style: you have these pretentious leaders posturing they are modern-thinking & big on social justice but too stupid to create viable policies, so when the world coughs, the country gets pneumonia. Why, economic welfare is not a more critical part of social justice? All his pro-B-lister gay policies, which benefited only a miniscule segment (the B-listers) of an already miniscule gay minority, just prepared the mindset of millions of young unemployed to be sucked cheaply by the cheap gays who see Spain as the new cheap paradise...

As my A-lister Spanish friend Coño hissed while wrinkling his cute nose:"This mono has the gall to turn Spain into a cheap gay bar ..." Our friend Greg got six Spanish chavales for ten Euros each but he just asked them to fuck each other because when they arrived later in the room, he found just thinking of all the cheap gays who must have sucked the poor boys made him nauseous so he didn't even bother touching any of them. He just watched & he thought they were used to it already because they were really good in fucking each other. To think they were supposed to be students & were straight. Coño is irritated because Spain is now filled with gays of all types of cheapness, & cheapness is all around.

The lesson: not all men who are into men are cheap. Most have taste actually. They don't need pretentious social justice comics like Zapatero to enjoy delicious men. Zapatero wanted to pretend Spain was modern but he turned Spain into a third-rate male brothel of unemployed youths instead.

So was Zapatero saved by playing up to the B-lister gay propaganda? In the last elections, all the major autonomous areas controlled by Zapatero's Socialists were voted out of office. He'll soon be a faded nightmare but he has done his damage. Democracy is not only for pretend-to-be-modern slogans but most of all, to ensure most of the people really live decently.

Que barbaridad! Que asco! Lol.

But forget Zapatero. Enjoy a delicious Spaniard, our favorite, Jose Maria Manzanarez.

Revista Glamor: Jose Maria Manzanarez & Nieves Alvarez

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

POLITICAL FACE OF NAUSEA: The B-Lister Kind of All-Male Sex

Britain is hot nowadays. My British friends, Ewan & Pete, both incurable lovers of straight lads, are heartened by the fact there are now only 1% British who self-identify as gay. Ewan joked that the reason I didn't do much manhunts in Britain was because I willfully avoided it being the only country with "Muscle Mary rugby & cricket players" (his words). He challenged me, now that Britain has vindicated itself & shed off its "queasy edge", to make up for my "condescending attitude" by featuring full-frontal pics again. Something which I resolved to avoid when I became heterosexual (I don't suck dicks anymore, while Ewan identifies as straight but mostly sucks straight lads, absolutely ignores gays & plans to marry a girl soon). Well, there's a bit of truth to his joke actually. So I allow myself to be cajoled this time- just to celebrate the return of good taste in Britain, you may be surprised to see dicks here again today.

It's like beating a soon-to-be dead horse but I write about it again to clarify the context: the intensified spotlights on gays, originally intended to promote, actually just repelled most of the men who are into men so they ran away, leaving the 1% alone in believing their own noise. But the coup de grace, the knock-out punch, is just around the corner- the ominous fall of Western civilization & its political pretensions that allowed platforms to over-fantasizing queens. Clearly, one of the unintended consequences of the recent media-centric gay struggles was they elicited nausea instead. We call them the B-lister struggles (we'll explain what a B-lister is later on). A close look at history would reveal that gays even became emperors in previous civilizations & those civilizations eventually fell. Now that gays are noisily insinuating themselves again in the present West-dominated civilization, the said civilization is itself in danger of collapsing (read here). Deja vu? We observed that the increased acceptance of gays is turning out to be a marker of the impending demise of a civilization because it signified, for gays to be accepted in the end, so many other "degenerative elements" have already been fatally accommodated beforehand into the system, irreversibly compromising its optimal operation (in the guise of being democratic, exposing a self-destructive flaw in democracy itself). The B-lister gays now appear to be one of the perennial last straws before the final implosion (the others are politicians who insist on being dumb up to the end). After the expected backlash & the restoration of taste & common sense, back to gopher life once again?

Not my problem anymore. I became nauseated too with the view, but I didn't simply run away, I converted myself into a heterosexual.

Time to reminisce. I remember the first time I became really queasy about sex between gays when I started researching after I first noted my attraction to naked athletes. I found one of the old books written by Christopher Isherwood, one of the early gay activists, where he detailed liberally his sex life with various men who turned out to be mostly gays ( some were mentioned as military men who had no problem shrieking they were queer). I came out of it actually nauseated & not at all sympathetic. It was not the type of sex I was pining for. In a short time, I discovered I could get the kind of straight men I wanted without having to move into gay circles (ok, the best way to get them is flash thousands, not hundreds). I found no need to socialize with outed gays, especially political ones (who needs gay marriage anyway when you can't even have sex with one?) Present gay politics only cater to these types, they expect everybody to be incapable of nausea like them & even have the gall to police others to toe the line, adapt to their bad taste or they will denounce you as homophobic (supposed to be a whip label but which actually became a badge of honor just as long as they were kept away). I found one can best enjoy sex with straight men far away from the gay circuit, the latter just gives a nauseating tinge to a delicious thing like sex anyway. In short, gays have no place in the all-male sex of my life. Lucky for me I found many like-minded friends as company in my manhunts. We were attracted to men, but only to the real men, definitely not to the trying hard to be men. I've documented here copiously my repulsion to the clones, the knockoffs- gays who strive to pretensiously look like straight men complete with bulging muscles, moustache & all (who are they fooling anyway?). Isherwood described his former partner Bill Caskey as treating his sex partners who are openly homosexual as B1 while those who are predominantly heterosexual as A1. Caskey preferred the A1 types, giving tremendous insecurity to Isherwood who ultimately found a fellow B-lister as lifetime companion. You can say the remaining 1% in Britain are mostly B-listers. The others decided they clearly had other options. In Britain, you often hear B1 gays self-satisfied in saying there's general acceptance of being "gay & normal". Probably among their fellow B-listers, or they must be in delusions -otherwise, they would have seen the rest like Ewan & Pete scampering away.

Somebody wrote me he's a former military guy & he actually attached a picture showing a blonde, blue-eyed 6'4" 28 year-old All-American boy from the Midwest. He's a B-lister because he admitted he came out as gay after his discharge. It was only a picture so I didn't know if he had a lisp or if he sashayed, probably not or he wouldn't have been assigned to Iraq. He asked me to tell him if he didn't look like a typical straight guy. He missed the point all along. The fact a boy looks straight doesn't make him as desirable as a straight man if he turned out not to be straight after all. The fact he is gay when he looks so straight makes him even MORE undesirable. The eww factor. Ever thought what it feels like when you bought what you thought was a genuine Rolex watch & it turned out to be a knockoff from China? There's disappointment, then disgust. If he insisted on kissing you, there'd be vomiting too, like what happened when a gay classmate seduced me & I vomited all over his face.

Why is this preoccupation of gay men to pretend looking like straight anyway? Again, who are they fooling when you can see they're exhausted by the effort? They're just corrupting the delicious stereotypes of real men. Reality check: they won't get the same treatment anyway. You can always make copycat bags of Louis Vuitton, but do you really believe these copycats will be respected once their duplicity is uncovered? There's actually this belief effeminate gay men can pass themselves off as effeminate straight men. The effeminacy of gay men comes in a SET of signs: concurrent defects in speech, ambulation, gestures, behavior. You DOUBT an effeminate straight man but you KNOW an effeminate gay man when you see one (the congenitally outeds). But what does it matter really, when he's uncovered as gay he'll be unfit for sex to A-listers anyway. As I wrote before in a previous post, B-lister gays come across as the least potent in their masculinity, like drinking whiskey with no alcohol no matter how big their muscles are. It appears, the potency (& desirability) increases as you go up the bisexuality scale towards the heterosexual end-point. A man is a real man when he is fully-working as a man (this notion gains credence as you realize only 1% fails fully). The world becomes a nauseous place if you started making excuses for the deficients & even gloss over them as sexy just to be politically patronizing.

You know what's wrong with the B-list struggles- they have all the theories down pat but they conveniently forgot the critical part- ultimately, you're fighting to have sex freely with your partner, but what if he makes you puke? You're already miserable from being born a gay man, why make yourself more miserable by swallowing your vomit just to have sex & pretend married just like the heteros? Well, only a few are left desperate enough to have no other option. The funny thing is, as it turns out now, the noisy B-listers comprise the minority of a minority, only 1%. Yeah, Britain is again a sexy place.

Too bad I'm now a heterosexual. Ewan suggested I have a relapse. I wasn't offended, British humor is sexy again.

Sunday, August 7, 2011

THE BEATEN GENERATION PART 2: The Marker of the End of a Civilization

by Dick of All Dicks & Straight Boy Poster

Part 1 here

Increasingly, I have this creeping feeling that all our recent posts on the fast diminishing number of self-identified gays in Britain (now only 1% of the population) have just proven the growing irrelevance of one of the biggest political polemics in the Western world in the past years. Because the political system (& civilization) that allowed it to be a hot topic is in danger of becoming irrelevant itself- & that is the bigger news which might turn more irrelevant the already fast becoming irrelevant gay issue. As the economic picture turns murkier from America to Europe, more & more are forced to face the gnawing reality- how long will the Western Democratic system itself, which championed individual rights, last? If the predictions by some experts in the last World Economic Forum at Davos, Switzerland come true- that the Chinese economy will be twice as large as the American economy by 2030 & the Chinese economy will be the biggest in the world before the decade is through- will anybody even believe Western democratic principles if the West loses out? Would the plight of the remaining 1% of the population who identify as gay be even countenanced long enough by the 99% who would suddenly find themselves deprived of the luxury to pretend they could still posture as high-thinkers amidst their shrinking lifestyles? They were supposed to be progressing forward with their more sensitive & enlightened take on life- but why are they poised to slide down a semi-Third World existence instead? Were all the increased sensitivity & enlightenment amidst the lowering of societal standards to accomodate all the rabble (in the guise of equality) just to prepare them for a harder life instead? Does becoming equal mean becoming poorer & cheap?

Curious. If you look at history where gays became emperors & leading scholars in the ancient times, why did those civilizations vanished at their moments of glory? Why are all these supposed-to-be increased sensitivity to gays in the West occurring at a time when the Western civilization which ruled the World for the past millenium is itself in danger of collapsing?

Is the increased sensitivity to gays a MARKER of the demise of a civilization?

I'm too liberal to be even dare to think of the similarities in the script of that ancient morality play Sodom & Gomorrha, but I couldn't help it, the coincidence is just bafflingly close...

How many deaths at Kent State ended the countercultural revolution of the latter half of the 20th century? How many would it take for a Tien An Men at the Washington Mall? Will anybody even bother to come when they would rather find their next meal?

Anti-gay? Bigot? Backward? Politically incorrect? Not really. Just a more realistic view of world events...

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

THE NON-HETEROSEXUAL NIGHTS IN HOLLYWOOD Part 2: Love Means Never Having To Say You're Nauseous ("The Marlon Brando Syndrome")

Part 1 here

I wonder if anybody even expected that the main enemy would turn out to be nausea.

The fantasy was pointing the spotlight & microphone on gays would lead to more & more "coming out", hordes joyously identifying with them & victoriously joining the bandwagon for their fight. As it turned out, as the latest surveys from Britain showed only 1% now self-identify as gay, all the spotlight & noise just turned off the majority of the men who are into men who stayed away instead of identifying with the crowd. Instead of being inspired, most were nauseated by what they saw, & that's exactly what happened to me early on. It's all down to good taste & common sense really. If you can pass yourself as bi or better as hetero, who would want to be known as the newest Mary in town anyway? And who would want to suck a Muscle Mary when you want to vomit instead? Just gives a clue to the heights of magical thinking indulged in by some daydreamers. To think they even expect you to fall in love while you're already having a difficult time keeping your nausea in check.

I bet the ranks of bisexuals just swelled, & some long-time bisexuals unnerved by the new-arrivals within their midst just upgraded themselves to self-identified heterosexuals. I can also see some clowns wanting to suck a cock but never wanting to give up their claim to the heterosexual brand so they condescendingly call "ignorant & backward" anybody who can see what they really are. Many of these types inhabit Hollywood. They know they won't have a career if they revealed their real sexuality. Of course, all these means nobody wants the gay tag, admittedly the pariah identity. Despite (or because of) the intensive promotions of the last years, nobody wanted to be pigeonholed & looked down to in the end, much less be the object of nausea. Reality check: only 1% remains.

The 9% don't want anything to do with the 1% anymore. Even the playboy rock star who loves swallowing cum or the playboy Hollywood actor who have sex with grandfathers identify as heterosexuals.

In the preceding post (see here ), we presented our little study on the various types of self-identified heterosexuals (where a big portion turned out to be bisexuals in varying degrees of deviance along the homosexual-heterosexual spectrum). How about the self-identified heterosexuals who are tranny chasers & admirers? This is the area where sexuality really has challenged all the accepted definitions. First, there was a small study done by an Italian woman, the aunt of my friend Tomasso, whose husband she learned was a frequent client of a Brazilian transexual prostitute in Rome. It turned out she was helping the transexual legalize her stay when she discovered her husband's secret so the trans prostitute went along with her plan. The Italian woman wanted to be sure of the real sexuality of her husband before she confronted him (her husband had sex with the trans every week).

The test was: what would be the reaction of her husband if a non-trans man was included into his weekly orgy? According to the trans, about 95% of her clients wanted to be fucked in the ass, including the husband. What would happen if in the middle of the orgy, the non-trans man would take over from the trans in fucking the man? So you thought the husband would violently protest the presence of the non-trans man? The non-trans man was a muscular though smooth rent boy who was given a purple eyeshadow & nothing more. If ever the husband thought of him as a trans, it would be for the flimsiest reasons, he could pass more as a glam rocker. He was able to fuck the husband, the latter sucked his cock & had facials (the trans was told to let the rent boy take over after she dismounted). The rent boy with the eyeshadow even joined them with the cocaine afterwards, & he had a baritone voice. Of course, this was a very small sample, it wasn't the best representative of the complete picture. It was more a hilarious example of the sense of humor of the wife who tried to make sense of her predicament with mirth. But it gives you an idea of the extent sexual pleasures are rechanneled so people don't face up to the truth they are less than heterosexual, even if they are far from being considered as outright fags.

Our blog has a transvestite assistant, & out of curiosity, I asked her to check her fans. Like her bosses, only the straight guys work for her. Whenever she chats online with an admirer, she only does so with one with accounts primarily looking for women. Overcompetition for the latter probably drove them to experiment (It should be noted here the tranny chasers, or those who fetishize the dicks of trannies, weren't considered by our assistant as straight enough for her standards). Chats are convenient transitions for horny straight guys to "acclimatize" themselves with a not-so-woman woman before jumping into bed with one. I asked her to look over 20 of her favorites in the last year, the newbies. In a short time, metamorphic sexuality set in as the guys discovered they could get orgasm without being hit by lightning. Our assistant said she was able to fuck them all in the ass on the second date though they all refused on the first date (fucking straight men is her fetish). All sucked her dick & ate her cum on the second date as well. All of them returned for more fucking & cum-eating for the third date but half of them would disappear to hook up with other trannies after that (her friends, who told her they did more of the same); the rest would progress to swallowing her cum later on but eventually all returned to the real women. Their accounts have all disappeared from the tranny sites. If ever you wanted proof of the reversibility of metamorphic sexuality, especially along the bisexual spectrum, it's right there. The 20 were monitored after they stopped seeing our assistant: they are all monogamous to their women & they all listed themselves as straights in their remaining hetero dating site accounts. But these are recent events, not enough time horizon to study them, you never know what the 20 are capable of in the near future. They have shown the extent they could stretch their pleasure points. What would happen if their present hetero relationships fall apart? Was the adventure all transitory or was it a latent thing?

Personally, on our desirability scale, I would rate the tranny chasers/chick-with-dick fetishists as bisexual more on the gay side of the scale. The 20 newbies were just at the midpoint (Bisexual 4-6 out of 10). I could've still sucked the latter but would vomit just considering the former.

When a heterosexual man is made horny by a girl, the main sexual objective is to have his penis penetrate her vagina. What happens when he claims he's attracted to body parts belonging to a man that seemingly look like parts of a woman but without the vagina, would there be enough proof of his heterosexuality as long as he could fuck a girl afterwards? What about if he was fucked, sucked the dick of one he knew was a man & even ate his cum REPEATEDLY over a period of time? What the test on the Italian husband seemed to show was how flimsy the defense in denying one's bisexuality. It's mostly to self-rationalize repressed fears. The husband could always play mind games, the fact the rent boy had an eyeshadow was apparently enough reason to consider him a tranny, enough to suck his cock & be fucked by him, just like what was usually done to a real tranny & vice versa. In an Italian sex forum, the usual rationalization of trans-loving Italian men in sucking the cock of a trans is because they allegedly wanted her to enjoy the sex too. Same rationale with getting fucked. Whatever. But they still self-identify as straight after getting fucked & eating cum.

Such convolutions just show it's really very hard to surrender the heterosexual identity after all. Anyway, they would reason, they could fuck a woman & they have no problems getting it up each time. Precisely, just like the other true bisexuals, but which they mostly refuse to identify with. Tranny chasers content themselves with thinking they are higher than the fags in the hierarchy of sexual respectability, they are still in the team of procreation anyway. Of course, they have all the right in the world to identify themselves with whatever they like. But the big questions are: is it all only about labels? OR DO THE LABELS HAVE SOME USE AFTER ALL?

Before we answer that, here's something that will raise more eyebrows: we're not yet through with the trannies. My friend Greg is also a part-time cross-dresser & he does occassional cocksucking expeditions to adult bookstores & clubs. He made his own study in 2008: the guys he sucked FREE in his Georgina persona were straight (not seen having sex with any man during observation period, only with women). On our desirability scale, they got 10 out of 10. Those he sucked FREE during a one-day test period in his male self were mostly gay. He couldn't extend the test period because he was vomiting excessively already. Rated 0 in the desirability scale.

The common denominator of all those wanting to identify themselves as heterosexual is they can get it up with women consistently. The fact they do it with "chicks with dicks" on the side is beside the point to them, they're not fags who surrendered because they can't fake it anymore with a woman. Though some gays can make it with girls sometimes, spontaneous erection is not consistently forthcoming, & that's the most common reason for a forced coming-out. That's also one of the main reasons why we considered them as unfit for sex: they come across as the least potent in their masculinity, like drinking whiskey with no alcohol no matter how big their muscles are. It appears, the potency (& desirability) increases as you go up the bisexuality scale towards the heterosexual end-point. A man is a real man when he is fully-working as a man (this notion gains credence as you realize only 1% fails fully). The world becomes a nauseous place if you started making excuses for minor deficiencies & even gloss over them as sexy.

But what for are the labels, & where is the woman in all of these considering she's turning out to be the key reference point of male heterosexuality? The labels are important for the woman (& everybody, for that matter) to locate herself in the scheme of things. Marlon Brando had a string of girlfriends & wives but when he died, he had himself cremated, his ashes were admixed with the ashes of his former roommate Wally Cox, a self-identified heterosexual, who died in 1973 yet but Brando kept his ashes. Following his wishes, their ashes were strewn over the desert. What he was unable to achieve in life, he got in death. Brando must be happy now for eternity- but what did he leave behind? Broken families, broken wives, broken children. A self-identified heterosexual has all the right to call himself whatever he wants but the woman must be sure she is not a mere reference point of his sexual identity but the real love of his life. All the while, his husband may be called a playboy by society while he changes women, including her, to shore up his self-respect. Brando admitted to his psychologist co-star Kim Stanley that he had a string of sexual relationships with women after an intense relationship with a man, just to prove to himself he's not a queer. Women may end up as supporting characters, not the leading lady, in the life of any man who has what we elected to call as "Marlon Brando Syndrome". The emotional focus of his life may lie in the hidden aspects of his sexuality, not on the parade of women seen by everybody. The right labels could have precluded everybody from proceeding with the wrong assumptions which destroyed lives in the end.

That doesn't make Brando a fag, however. For all the noise, fags couldn't get it up for those many women. He should just have used our scale: Bisexual more on the gay side of the scale. At least, there could've been forewarning to everybody. Or if he were still alive, I could've recommended the proper sexual conversion therapy to get rid of the gay side.

Btw, the Italian woman divorced her husband. Not because he was bisexual but because she felt nauseated kissing him from then on. Again, the magic word that brings sense to the world: nausea.