 |
| Peyton Manning & his hot wife |
by Dick & Poli
This post was written under the supervision of Medical Doctors. They were
among the first sexual converts.
You will notice I no longer bother with contemporary
gay politics, it's outdated (though it's blissfully unaware yet)
DEFINITIONS
1. A-lister
homosexual man- a gay man who can't stomach sex with another gay man
2. B-lister
or "Kevlarite"- gay man with a Kevlar stomach (We'll use "Kevlarite" from now on
to avoid the low class connotations of the term "B-lister").
We'll start
tackling the main puzzle in everybody's mind: in the sexual conversion of a gay
man, when does heterosexual desire come in?
For the pure homosexuals, it is not as impossible as you think. As Science has proved time and again, nature loves puzzles but it provides a
trapdoor. Locating it is just a matter of time, even luck, as in our case, when
I accidentally discovered how to convert my sexuality (please read it in the
preceding post of the series). For bisexuals, heterosexual desire would come
out as a purer force after the first phase of the therapy, which basically
involves turning off the homosexual impulses (only pure homosexuals need the
second phase). Most bisexuals who are now mainly heterosexual actually just do
simple willpower to not act on their homosexual impulses, but that's not
conversion, they're still in fact mostly bisexuals. Curiously, most of the so-
called vocal "intellectuals" nowadays are actually mere closet
versions of the latter, they mostly want to sneakily pass themselves off as
normal as well, as we'll explain later below (what I call "polluted
expertise" which became the toxic basis of today's pretentious politics).
Sexual conversion should have been a simple process: unfortunately, political
delusions got in the way. Present gay
politics, compromised as it is by other militant pretensions, actually wants gays
to remain gay because gays (obviously Kevlarites) have a crucial role to play
in its outdated political scripts. (We'll tackle throughout the series the role
of gays in the sexist and patriarchal ideologies which militants use to
underpin their equality-cum-modernization pretensions). My British friend said
the situation actually has a Keystone cop flavor to it, so I told him, no
wonder, a fart could be a gem of wisdom in times of decline. It’s a matter of
faith, he replied. Then he added sottovoce: The sacred road to Equaland, ask Forrest Gump.
We have an
upbeat title because we are happy. How can we not be happy when we are not gay
anymore? Really, is anybody actually happy, much less proud, being gay? To my
muscular "sisters" with 6-packs still languishing with the revolting
disease, don't despair. Welcome to the future. No need to be revolting anymore,
being gay is so yesterday.
I wrote in
the preceding post that it was actually easy converting from gay to straight.
That's the first surprise. Here's the second one: it is actually fast. It took
me only four months, & that was when the method was at it's crudest because
I was the first one. The longest among my friends was my neighbor Greg who
actually started as a Kevlarite but later decided to become A-lister because he
never found among gays the ecstasy he was seeking. It took him more than a
year, about 16 months.
The third
surprise is that the result is not dependent on the "manly"
appearance of the subject, it mainly depends on the level of his revulsion to homosexuals
particularly. So an A-lister fairy has a faster chance to convert than a
Kevlarite Muscle Mary.
The fourth
is the most surprising: anybody who has attended a Science class will be
familiar to the order beneath the chaos of nature, as if creation was accomplished
using well-tested formulas & equations. There's logic in the chaos, Sexual
Conversion is like that. As your homosexual revulsion reaches its crescendo and
your attraction to straight men plummets, your libido seems to lose the
cobwebs, and slowly laid bare, as if forgotten by time, is- voila!- a barely-alive, gasping for
breath, struggling desire! Flickering,
tentative, as if it couldn't quite believe it was kidnapped & shackled for
an eternity. Marvel at the mysteries of life. It's heterosexual desire!
If there's
a Holy Grail, you just woke it up. The second phase of the therapy is to
resuscitate it and give it freedom to bloom. Marvel at the ignorance of
delusional politics. If you didn't use your head, you would still be gay.
RESEARCH AND THE FUTURE
Finally,
the right things are moving. There are four confirmed researches that are
underway- one in China, another in Russia, one in the US and
another in an Arab country. There are 6 others which apparently have no
intention of informing us but we have caught whiff anyway (learned even the
devious reasons why). If anybody else is planning, we would appreciate it very
much if you at least inform us (we honor confidentiality, we understand the
security concerns). Let's see if the real experts among you can refine the
methodologies that I will present here, or introduce standardized
revulsion-inducing drugs perhaps as pharmacologic component of the therapeutic
regimen in order to accelerate the process (actually, one of the doctor-converts
incorporated a certain drug into his therapy & claimed accelerated
Revulsion-induced Conversion as a result, we'll describe that later in the
series). Our best hope is to find preventive & corrective measures that
could be instituted right in childhood long before the full symptomatology
flares up. My belief is, like most disease, that the earlier the intervention
is instituted, the better. Well, only lack of imagination & outdated
politics can set up roadblocks. But at last, things are gearing now, I can see
the most progressive areas going forward will be those with less gays. In the
modern future just up ahead, the presence of even a single case of homosexual
disease will be a public health emergency.
Needless to
say, the rules of the game have changed. We're not only talking about declining
countries anymore (read Western European) which are fast becoming irrelevant anyway
(though they will eventually knock some sense on their heads as they plummet
downwards, no doubt about that). I'm not oblivious of the fact that the discovery
of a working well-codified sexual conversion program is one of the biggest
achievements of man. It will not only impact on gays but it will have untold
effects on human society now and in future generations and civilizations. As my
British friend Ewan would say, "this is Newtonian in proportion, of Nobel
dimensions". But awards and prizes will not be enough reason to come out
now that I'm normal. The successful treatment of gays means a totally
homophobic future. So just do your research, mention the blog as reference and
you can all have the Nobels of this world all by yourselves (though with the
prevalence of political “kink” nowadays in the Western intellectual classes,
that would be too far-fetched. Now, if only they actually use the program and
be converted themselves).
IN THE CUSP
OF A REGRESSIVE MODERNITY
I received
an email from a supposedly well-decorated anthropologist (not confirmed) in
which he voiced his support for gay marriage, saying that 'Homosexuality is not
a disease" so humanity can evolve into whatever, marriage included. No
need to bother with his arguments because the main pillar is already wrong,
which makes the rest as mere magical thinking (We'll explain later why certain
people have to keep repeating that line "homosexuality is not a
disease" like Goebbels, but suffice to say for now, that's the cornerstone
of their politics and they can never backtrack because their entire agenda will
crumble). Gay marriage is nothing but
condemning people to wallow further into their disease. Treat them & I bet
they will vomit seeing each other's face. This anthropologist is another
one of those "ignorant" intellectuals who leveraged supposed
high credentials to peddle his flighty ideas: Science is not static, don't
say "not a disease" until a scientific procedure has confirmed it's
really not a disease. You don't even know fully well what Homosexuality is,
much less what caused it, and you primp authoritatively, gurgling dishonestly
that it isn't a disease? (Anthropology
is not exactly a popular field, I doubt it attracted the best minds. I usually
only read their field data but I rely on my own interpretation &
conclusion). Note that many of these
academics are closet B-lister gay themselves (I'll explain why I know
later), & their main model is ancient Greece, when the ignorant ancients
were easily "convinced" by gays in the upper classes who were able to
maneuver themselves into positions of influence. Like now, when they are
crawling in the very visible but relatively wimpy fields, like the media &
academe, which ironically aren't attractive to many straight men, who prefer
the silent but deep manly realm. It
should have been easy, but unfortunately for them, there is a higher level of
education now compared to that of Ancient Greece. The sad thing is that society has differentiated now into so many
separate bubbles that despite the noise of the former in tandem with their
cohorts (especially the militant feminists), the critical audience, the real
men (excluding the wimps), have tuned off, so the clowns were left merely
convincing each other like backwoods slapstick comedians. A fool's game. The
top television program bandied as proof of their success merely had 12,000,000
viewers at its most watched episode. In a country of 313,000,000, how many have
bothered? Not even all the estimated 18% liberal bothered to watch it. Oh, the
viewership soars when the NFL games are on the cards and top all the ratings.
It's obvious the real men ignored again the latest "intellectual"
drivel designed to "make them think" and all those tedious
pretensions. Mostly, the pretentious exist only in some circumscribed parts of
the media and society, which if you ignore entirely considering the variety of
options, you won't even notice they exist. I doubt if most men even bother to snort
some bored acknowledgement.
Long-held medical concepts are always being
updated and, for obvious reasons, medical textbooks continually evolve into
newer and newer editions. Psychological issues, especially psycho-sexual, are
the most likely to be not cast in stone (your variables are mostly subjective,
seldom objective- do you really believe a person would open up fully to a mere
researcher in a delicate personal issue like this?). Even now, an atom,
something that can be physically detected, therefore verifiable with certainty,
is still shedding its secrets as we speak. The old principle of sexual
orientation was, at best, merely theoretically conceived through dated
deduction, it's time for a complete overhaul. As it's turning out now, the
sexual orientation of an individual can change and could be indicative of an
underlying pathology. Sexual orientation, when not heterosexual, is a sign and
symptom of a disease. Scientists are
always careful to challenge long-held beliefs no matter how tenuous its
foundation if they have no viable counter-argument. Well, I have- my own sexual
conversion and those of my friends (all of whom are as highly-educated in
science as the original researchers were- btw, most are even doctors of
medicine, and they surely have better credentials in this regard than mere
anthropologists). Science is not ivory tower theorizing, as if mere concepts
are divine laws. It's ultimately about proving. Can they actually prove sexual
orientation can't change? Never them, but I already did it can. Not a few are
already currently living the benefits of the proof, as you'll read them in this
series. And anybody can replicate them by following the methods we're
describing here, the ultimate vindication of any true scientific principle.
This will
be bloody: so many political & intellectual pretensions which shaped contemporary,
mostly liberal, thought & politics in recent times will be exposed as based
on a shabby superstition, especially
during these Whiny Age when some pretentious elements try to supposedly modernize the world with
what turned out to be snake oil (I wonder if this lapse was widespread: is that
why there is decline? Is it coincidental that the decline afflicts most
severely the areas which embraced this "modern superstition" like
certain countries in Europe?). It seems to me the upside down modern version of
Galileo challenging supposedly unscientific church teachings circa 2012. This
time, it's the noisy headwind of the self-styled "intellectuals"
which play the role of the ancient prelates who would declare sacrilege to
anybody who questions their "science" (if it doesn't fit their
agenda, no way is it science? ). With the gay issue, they were caught in
cahoots with a disease. This will actually undermine outright the credibility
of their agenda (the ideological foundation of which we'll discuss below), that
it has been a project of intellectual charlatans all along, so we expect
vigorous (but eventually pointless) resistance for some time to come. But they
obviously have different motives, so we can just go on right ahead.
Finally,
something really good for gays. No mere pawns for political comedians. Gays
don't need compassion, they only need to be normal like everybody else.
Compassion has become the new superstition. Because the truth is, no matter
what esoteric political theory one hangs on to, that won't solve his problem.
He will still be gay, and no, it will never become banal because to most
people, even to most gays, being gay forever means forever be revolting (you'll
learn why in the next section).
The only
viable salvation is actually not more politics but sexual conversion. No reason to be revolting
anymore. Kevlar stomachs will be history. Long live, gag reflex!
NEOHETEROSEXUALIZATION
BLUES
It may interest
you to know there are mental changes when you become a real heterosexual man.
Suddenly, ideas pour forth all at once. While before, it had a more
"feminine" cadence- gays, like females, like to talk a lot because
ideas come forth more linearly: they babble about one topic to exhaustion, then the next one pops out and they babble
again ad nauseam, etc. This probably explains why straight men (most
billionaires identify as straight), though relatively silent, will eventually
succeed lopsidedly in the big leagues, becoming the richest, the most powerful,
etc. (note the sexist & homophobic
implications, rendering obvious the futility of pandering too much to these
political ideologies, as I'll tackle later on in other posts). There is a
drawback to me as a writer, however: ideas rush out so profusely that my pieces
keep getting longer now compared to before my pre-heterosexual days. The
article you usually read here is oftentimes only a tenth of the original draft
written in one hour. That much has been edited out.
Another
heterosexual change is I don't relish plunging into frequent long-winding
polemics anymore, that partly explains the less frequent articles since I
converted (that also explains why women, gays & wimps have dominated the
ambient media noise because the real men just shrugged their shoulders and took
refuge into their bubble where they go their business the "manly"
way, leading to such dimwit conclusions like End of Man, etc ).
So what
happened anatomically when I turned heterosexual? Were the changes the result
of biochemical adjustments (hormonal, enzymatic) that came with the sexual
conversion? How? What were the morphological and biochemical changes when the
natural revulsion to homosexuality was restored to its appropriate calibration?
Were there dormant receptors that were activated? In what part of the system?
So many questions, the new researchers will surely come handy.
The human
organism only needs proper equilibration to function normally. The changes
above bely the common belief that the "software" of being a normal
heterosexual man were mainly a result of external conditioning and can be
modified to fit certain exigencies, like political demands to attain equality,
for example. Every man inherits a basic blueprint which governs on what he
basically is (the Genotype) which will interact with the environment to create
the final expression of how he will turn out to be (Phenotype). But the
capacity of the external environment to edit the basic blueprint is not as
strong and encompassing as they make it out to be. The commands of the genotype
will prevail and environment will discover it's read-only in most areas.
Listening to these "intellectuals", you get the impression they
actually believe they can overwrite it with their delusions. We call that
severe wishful thinking, unfortunately very popular among
"intellectuals" in this age of decline.
Most things
are really natural, like your low threshold for revulsion, for instance. This
colors all your perception, and that includes sexual. Any change done to the
environment to elicit a targeted response from you (to lessen your revulsion to
gays, to name one) shouldn't surpass that threshold or you'll still puke and
they will lose you. Like what happened to me. Their effort to force
indiscriminately the acceptance of gays as sex objects tripped all the alarms
in my pleasure defense mechanisms that my counter-reaction was so violent I
scared out Homosexuality itself away from me. They tried to force their version
of a gay utopia, I discovered sexual conversion instead.
Sometimes,
you'll be amazed at the simplistic approach. The stigma of being called
"homophobic" will force anybody to just grin and bear it? Who's
fearful of stigma nowadays anyway? If you can't be ashamed of being gay
anymore, how can you expect anybody now to be ashamed of anything else, much
less from just being called "homophobic"? You'll be surprised that
word hasn't exactly seeped in much outside the militant sectors and some politicized
media outlets. Here's a test: remove all
the people who use the word "homophobia" from your social life and
you'll see the tremendous improvement. You will lose the pretentious and the
Kevlarites, which are just a handful anyway, and be left with the delicious. I
actually use this as a standard in filtering my social circles and I totally
have lost the aggravations.
Of course,
that's old stuff. Now that we have reliable sexual conversion programs, no
doubt about it, total homophobia is the expected norm of the future.
(This
section I will expand in the next article, tackling the pathogenesis of
A-lister & Kevlarite Homosexuality and the facets of the phenotype where
Sexual Conversion can come in. It will be long and technical. Suffice
to say for now we believe revulsion to same-sex sex is in the genotype, it is
in the base command, and a Default Heterosexuality is protected by innate defense mechanisms, one of
them is your level of revulsion. The disease comes in with the derangement of
these defense mechanisms due to some factors (this explains the presence of
sexual deviance among mammals, which also have DNA and are also prone to
mutations). Luckily for us, the expression of the code for revulsion is one of the few areas of
the genotype which could be "influenced" from the outside, and that
forms the basis of our sexual conversion programs.
We will tie
everything with other militant –isms which try to use the same methods
to force its politics. This is important because that's the very objective of
all these trendy obfuscation of definitions which are primarily done to assuage
political tensions arising from alleged discrimination, etc. The reason for the
recent predilection of some "intellectual" sectors to muddle the
definitions of words like "marriage" is, of course, obvious- they
want to write their own reality. Which makes it ridiculous considering they
couldn't even recognize a disease when they see one, what kind of reality are
they capable of building? More often than not, the natural realities are willed
to buckle down through simple political delusions. A keener mind will know
right away delusions will still be delusions in the end.)
THE PATRIARCHY OF REVULSION: Polluted Expertise
I wrote
before that the favorite self- compensatory ruse for the inadequate is to
posture as intellectual. None more clearer than
in gay issues. I always write gays are mere pawns in a dark political
drama. Read on. You'll learn why sexual conversion will always be anathema to
these people.
I remember
this quote from a former Professor:
... To keep sexuality secret is to
reinforce sexual, racist & imperialist hierarchies
by not challenging the core issues of sexism which are supported by homophobic
& patriarchial ideologies... Blah... Blah...
I actually laughed when I heard that in a
lecture from my professor, & it was made funnier because he said it
complete with a grave manly facial expression & just as grave manly voice
(deeply modulated to sound macho), as if he was lecturing on the most sacred
secret of the world. Actually, he was a closet himself, that's his sacred
secret: he tried to solicit me in the urinal of a bar outside the campus in my
first week in college. His son was my classmate. But even if he was really
straight, it sounded as more like a pretentiously intellectual BS to me then. Now
that I've seen the turns of the world, I find it simplistic. But that line is
supposed to form part of the intellectual DNA of a liberal, modern civilization
steeped in Equality, etc. At least, according to some self-styled
intellectuals. And closet Kevralites.
To a
good-looking male student, college is virtually a homosexual obstacle course
with closet professors. Plainer-looking students may not be aware of it,
but a great part of the aggravations in
the life of the handsomer ones is parrying sexual advances from revolting old
men. It got so bad I had a contest with another handsome classmate as to who
punched more professors between us (they can't report because we would report
them if they did). 70% of the male staff in my college were closet but all of
them had families with children mostly my own age then. One professor was also
a columnist in a local paper. Once, he was invited to a TV show for an
interview & he brought me as an aide (this before I knew his secret). Two
hulky TV types, one of whom was the manager, lost no time in hitting on me in
the urinal. Unluckily for them, I have a
Blackbelt in Karate. And that's only the beginning: a handsome face pulls out
all the skunks from their holes. We don't even have to talk about showbiz
people. So if ever you need proof that sexual deviance increases as you get
nearer the less manly professions, like the academe and media, you don't need
to go far. You begin to wonder, how many of those apparently straight people
posturing as "enlightened" and professing to fight for gays are
really there fighting to validate themselves? Is it a big wonder that the noise
is loudest from those sectors? (there is a big Congenitally Outed gay
population in them, but there is a bigger closet population). Do they think that's
the only way to validate themselves? This private battle to validate one's
disease as normal by political subterfuge is regressive. No, Ancient Greece is
ancient, it will never return. But there is hope, sisters ( or is it
"grandmas"?). Look at the therapeutic schema for Sexual Conversion
below. There is a better way to be validated, but the most important thing is
you will be cured of your disease. Your grandchildren will be prouder of you.
It's easy
to understand why one needs a thorough background check (especially sexual
history) of the authors of the scientific papers on sexuality (Homosexuality, particularly) where one would base his opinions from. So with the peers
who validated them. Dishonest collusions?
Polluted expertise? Politics reign everywhere, and unfortunately, Science is not exempted.
Gay
politics has been recruited by militant feminist politics into its struggles
against men. Sexism & Homophobia against Patriarchy. Little did they know
they merely constructed an elaborate philosophical underpinning for what we now
know as a mere disease. In their minds, they interconnected homosexuality and
feminism as part of a struggle- women vs. men, gays vs. straight,old-style
family vs. their modern family, etc., (in tandem with the perennially stalled Rich
vs. Poor script elsewhere which is now obvious will get nowhere, the Super Rich
merely rocketed away while the masses, including them, are on the verge of
the precipice, reduced to fantasizing about grand options which won't come). These
sectoral wars originally prescribed by Marx would give them, the chosen
"intellectual" ones, the chance to design (and I'll lend them this
imagery) the Phoenix which will rise from the ashes of the subsequent destruction of the old. More
like a script of a Harrison Ford movie to me. Unfortunately, I don't believe
we'll see a Phoenix rise; what will see emerge is more likely a duck.
But
suspense for the meantime. I will tackle the "duck" more exhaustively
in a future article of its own or it will eat up our present article. While I
understand why some women feel oppressed, I still want to say something that
can help everybody. Suffice to understand for now three things. First, where
these "intellectual" pretensions are coming from (The supposed
Patriarchy, stupid!). Second, to finally understand the stupidity of gays to
fight delicious straight men and have to settle with another fag when your own
stomach is hysterically telling you not to, all for the sake of a pretentious ideology (the Patriarch is delicious, stupid!). And third, also to tie into the picture my
present inclinations. I am more interested now with women so I have lots to say. It's nearly two years since
my sexual conversion. 600 men in a decade, 200 women in
nearly two years. Yeah, I have lots to say.
Did you
know it was my sexual escapades with
women after my sexual conversion which started me on the way back to Religion?
More on that later.
REVULSION, IN OTHER WORDS
In my gay
days, I actually preferred that gays would come out so I would know who to
avoid having sex with. The most revolting part of being an A-lister gay is to
discover you inadvertently had sex with another gay. I was never fooled, but
Greg was, and he puked for days. He actually got admitted in a hospital due to
dehydration. So you see, gays can be health hazards too.
Kevlarite groups and their pretentious cohorts
define homophobia as irrational hatred or intolerance of homosexuals. There's
no hatred or intolerance, and definitely nothing irrational to it, it is perfectly logical. Everybody has a right to
develop phobic reactions against anything or anybody they reject, phobia being
a natural phenomenon. What they don't have the right is if they act on those
phobic reactions to violate laws against the person of anybody. Homophobia is
simply revulsion and there are plenty of
reasons why people, including most gays (A-listers) are revolted over gays.
Don't compare gay politics with racial politics: skin color is just visual, but
gays bombard with multi-sensual attacks- visual, aural, ambiental, sexual, the
whole shebang. And you wonder why anybody should even be logically revolted?
Neither is the revulsion due to social conditioning either. Why, did somebody
condition you to be revolted with feces? Some actually eat it as a fetish, does
that make it not politically correct to be revolted with it? Homophobia is a
live reaction to an offending stimulus. If you look again at the Abridged Sexual History I presented in
the last post, my earliest recollection of being revolted was when I saw the
little queen in our Kindergarten class. I had a gay-friendly teacher &
mother who pushed gays into my face since I was young but I still grew up to be
an A-lister, nauseous just with the idea of sex with gays. Don't kid yourself,
the revulsion is natural.
But that's
perfect for our purpose. Actually, we need the strongest homophobic reaction so
that homosexual disease will scamper away and gays be finally treated. Homophobia, distilled to its most toxic
concentration, is the very armament to
treat homosexuality itself.
So it's
clear now how recent gay politics has pushed gays deeper into their disease. It
actually condemned the very treatment
that could save gays from the eternal dumpster.
But that
may be moot. Now that there is sexual conversion, homophobia should be seen in
a new light and, in some respects, encouraged to facilitate the process. There
are criminal laws that can protect gays anyway while they are in the process of
treatment so they don't need the "homophobia" bogey anymore. It's
obvious now: with the expected successful conversion of all gays, the future will be totally homophobic.
Options
have changed, so is reality. The real progress. Good for us all.
THERAPEUTIC REVULSION
Therapeutic
Schema for Sexual Conversion (for both gay men & lesbians):
A. A-lister Homosexuals, without physical or vocal
manifestations of their sexual orientation
1. Primary Phase- Revulsion Enchancement for future
straights (REFS)
2. Secondary Phase- Heterosexual Desire Resuscitation
(HDR)
B. Kevlarites, without physical or vocal
manifestations of their sexual orientation
1. Dekevlarization- conversion of a Kevlarite into an
A-lister
2. REFS
3. HDR
C. Bisexuals
C1. If he is A-lister
1. If he is mostly heterosexual, then it's only REFS
2. If he is more on the Homosexual side, then HDR is needed as well
C2. If B-lister
1. Dekevlarization
2. 1&2 of C1
C3. If they have physical or vocal manifestations,
refer to D
D. Congenitally Outed Gays
1. A& B, depending if they are either A-lister or
Kevlarite
2. Physical & Speech therapy
3. Surgery, mostly Plastic
IMPORTANT:
1. It is
advisable that you take the usual reparative therapeutic program because it has
more general goals aside from the psycho-sexual development of a heterosexual man. REFS
is more specific, targeted mainly on your sexual response, so even if you have
lost your homosexual desire, you still have the tendency to act your usual
ways. Fairies have a tendency to pull each other's hair when fighting, &
that's exactly what happened to Greg when he was still newly-converted. When
they had a fight, he pulled his girl's hair with both hands as if she was one
of the bitchy fairies he had encounters against in the past (Hey, Former Sister, don't
forget, you're supposed to be a macho already!)
2. You can
incorporate your Faith into the program. The religious usually have a lower
threshhold for revulsion so they easily respond. One of the early converts was religious (a
doctor), he incorporated it into his program and we discussed his view that it
was an improvement over the secular original. I actually was convinced . I will
do a separate article on this one.
You have
above the blueprint for freedom. We'll tackle each one by one in the coming
posts.
Next: Time to become Straight
Posts
