Thursday, October 9, 2014


 By Silvio

1. Revoltingness- capacity to elicit revulsion 
2. A-lister Gays- gays who can't stomach sex with other gays
3. Simpletonite Gays (formerly Kevlarite Gays- gays who can eat anything as if they have Kevlar stomachs; formerly B-lister Gays, for their low-class taste in sex )
4. Charlatans- read all the post with "Treating" in their title 
5. Charlatanic- pertaining to Charlatans 
6. Therapeutic Homophobia- sexual conversion modality based on the natural revoltingness of homosexuals.

Nope, we are not yet done with the blog. My apologies for the rather long hiatus. We are still discussing the treatment of Homosexual Disease through the manipulation of the prevalent revulsion to homosexuals even among homosexuals themselves (we call the methodology  "Therapeutic Homophobia"). It's actually simple: just turn the revulsion global. It's really easy to project that revulsion as your default reaction to the male stimulus. Your revulsion to sex with gay men is converted eventually to revulsion to sex with all men. We call this process "Neo-heterosexualization". Homosexual men who can't stomach sex with other gay men (the A-listers) can easily convert. The less finicky gay men (formerly I called them Kevlarites for their incredibly tough Kevlar stomachs, but we now call them Simpletonites for obvious reasons) are not hopeless, they still have functioning gag reflexes despite their vestigial thought processes. They only need a crash course to improve their taste. While it's amazing they have a strong stomach that they appear capable of eating inside a toilet, most most gay men simply can't, having sex with another gay man is worse than eating the toilet itself.

Writing about this topic has not been easy so I needed the 9-month break. I told you I have been and am still fighting my own revulsion just to bring the light. Writing has become torture because I had to dig up really stomach-churning events in the past to buttress my arguments. It's stop and go- I take time off if my stomach complained too much. I thought I needed a long break to recover my breath from prolonged exposure to the stench. I really can't come out with a half-baked piece just to silence my friends who never stopped "haranguing" me to write again. I have to relive the most nauseous periods in my recent life. If that is not plain torture, I don't know what is. If not for compassion, I won't bother.


Everybody now talks about the surreal times, a collapsing Western civilization in slow motion. It's not really a big surprise after all the parade of the ignorant social engineers passing of as  intellectual progressives in recent times. Reckoning time is taking its toll, and gay politics is one of the worst manifestations of the malaise. It was never wise to turn revulsion into a trend, everybody else will be vomiting in no time ( (that's their tactic,  create contrived trends which only them had the stomach to patronize, so all the Muscle Mary's will vomit anyway in the end). Are gays really victims? Or those exposed to gays the real victims? How can one not be a victim when one is practically blackmailed not to puke? Actually, it is worse among A-lister gays themselves. They are blackmailed not to puke to some really revolting creatures just because they also happen to love same-sex sex, just so the ignorant progressive brigade can sell their delusion of gay marriage and other pretentious stuffs which, as if in a karma,  are reinforcing the crumbling malaise all around.

I've presented in previous posts the diminishing number of gay marriages in countries that adopted it after the initial uptick (from the initial enthusiasm of the simpletons who get excited by banal trendsettings). That only means you can't force people to fall in love in a situation more conducive to puking. In fact this business of forcing people to get horny with somebody who revolts them is taking its toll on the "getting horny" process itself. After the noisy  drive to promote gay models in gay porn,  from what I've  heard, gay porn subscription now goes  down to as low as $1  monthly (three years ago when I was still not neo-heterosexual, I paid about $30 minimum). Well, who wants to get off from revolting stimuli in the first place?

 I don't speak gay and sex in the same breath. They are mutually exclusive. I don't call paid sex with real straight man gay, I call it all-male sex. To me, gay sex is when you do it with gay men, and gay sex has always
been a complete no-no because the mere thought of having sex with another gay man always revolted me. True, I really puked many times. My friend Greg got hospitalized for severe vomiting when he mistakenly swallowed what he would later discover to be a muscular closet queen.  Calling it gay sex will turn it into a revolting exercise. Just a matter of semantics? Semantics is all. I am proud of the homophobic vocabulary of my desire. In my previous sex life, I was interested in all-male sex but no gay decor, sound or man, not even a hint, please!

I think it's wiser to ensure that straight men would be delicious. That means less gay, the better. One should have the humility to accept gay men are damaged goods in the Delicious Sex Department, and they should not spoil the whole display. I don't think you're oppressing anybody if you found them repulsive. I found the pretentious allegations that gay men are victims as phony, most people would rather avoid a revolting situation with a revolting person than waste time dealing with them. Politically blackmailing them to put up with their revulsion will oppress everybody in the end.

Being gay is no different from being ugly. Somebody just don't find you sexy. If ugly people, the majority  in the world, can live to old age without organizing to politically blackmail everybody about the injustice of not being beautiful, why should gays have the gall to force everybody to put up with their revulsion?

I believe in freedom. Politics shouldn't shackle you with the delusions of  the  pretentious just because they had the chutzpah to organize (they are just used by shadow powerbrokers for their power plays, as we have seen). Diversity means everybody can seek his own crowd but don't pretend everybody should be forced to swallow his revulsion. The world is wide enough for anybody to seek one's own niche of comfort so what for are these political movements to politically blackmail everybody to act as if they were made with the same level of sensivity? Gay men have always revolted other men (that includes most other gays) and everybody should be free not to swallow that revulsion. I don't even socialize with most gay men, much less have sex with them, why should I be politically forced to treat them as if I'm not revolted when I've vomited many times? The West is bankrupt and crumbling- has anybody ever thought that coincided with the flourishing of the gay movement in the West? Could it be most of the economists who have been forced to be "trendy" and put up were so disoriented with all the putting up that they vomited through their wrong conclusions & decisions? Very likely.

(Btw, as to the question, one should not be refused work due to his sexual orientation, I don't agree with that. A revolting presence will destroy the dynamics in the workplace. The slow-motion collapse of Western civilization is one of the unrecognized results of a revolting contamination of the Western workplace).

But I have to take a break now. My stomach is churning... I'll just tuck in the continuation here later. I told you this topic is not pleasant to the stomach.

Thursday, January 9, 2014

Thanks for the Yuck, I needed that!

by Silvio Merkel

1. Revoltingness- capacity to elicit revulsion 
2. A-lister Gays- gays who can't stomach sex with other gays
3. Kevlarite Gays- gays who can eat anything as if they have Kevlar stomachs 
4. Charlatans- read all the post with "Treating" in their title 
5. Charlatanic- pertaining to Charlatans 
6. Therapeutic Homophobia- sexual conversion modality based on the natural revoltingness of homosexuals. 


I already consider the gay agenda as a dead issue, Homosexual Disease was already proven as curable. It is perfectly alright to slur a disease.

This is in support to Michael Johnson, the recently resigned British Football Association Inclusion Board member. He was recently pilloried by the charlatans for his comment that Homosexuality is detestable because of his beliefs. It’s always right to slur a disease. We condemn those who use fascistic politics to meddle with one's beliefs. Most gays support freedom (not only Sexuality, Belief, but most importantly, from disease) and Mr. Johnson has a right to detest anything that is against his belief, and we condemn those who criticized him, particularly these charlatans who claim they are fighting for gays while they are pushing them to be gay forever so they have dorks to use for their dark agenda. Most gays don't enjoy watching gay players in soccer anyway, they have no place in delicious sports (the tasteless ones have their Gay Games). Let's keep sports delicious! Spectator Sports are only for delicious straight guys!
(to the athletes who recently let themselves be used by the charlatans and pretended to "come out" though most gays know they are sisters, shame on you- do you know how many are puking now? Imagine, the innocent ones realizing they wasted time imagining sexy things about another sister? You realize how revolting that was? Yuck!)

You don't see here any picture of the diver who recently came out. The British sent almost half of the beefcake here and many sent his pictures but the first time I saw one, I knew right away he was gay so his name is not here (Remember the skier who "allegedly came out" before who was a big queen and you couldn't mistake him for anything else? Same vibes). Photos of a soccer player were sent by somebody from Germany a few years ago but my British friend Ewan told me he knew that was gay. Ewan had anecdotes to tell, so the German too isn't found on the index at our sidebar where most of the German mannschaft can be found. It's good I didn't see him play, or I'd be revolted with the memory. I can only guess how many are gagging with theirs now.

It seems the script now is for those "coming out" to say that their homosexual feelings were just recently discovered (obviously designed to be a blatant promotion as if being gay has ever been something worthwhile to aspire for, especially now when we have confirmed it is a disease. You see here the benefits of the Russian Anti-Gay Propaganda legislation, I find it is really wise, and that reflects its rise because after only two decades of Capitalism, it is now the richest country in Europe (GDP-PPP of $3.4 trillion, 2013). America should emulate it. Gays have conscience too, we know how luckless it is to be gay and it would be cruel to wish it on other people, best if you can avoid it (now you can with Therapeutic Homophobia).

When that basketball player "came out", some guy at ESPN was quoted by the charlatanic press as having allegedly "condemned" it because of his Religion. Now, the latest showboy was lambasted again, quoting Religion as usual, by a player from France this time, a country which was recently co-opted by the charlatans (for now, but I expect France, the next Euro basket case, will be among the first to revert against gay marriage, just like Spain is reverting now on the abortion issue). That contrived insertion of Religion into the drama is the sign that charlatans are at work here.

Two actors, who I didn't even know but got to know only when they outed, suddenly became producers, one of stars far bigger than them both, so coming out must really mean a lot to the pocket (these are only stars in the charlatanic space because only a few simpletons  are actually watching their shows; I'll explain below). My British friend Ewan said the coming-out show must really compensate well  because only a moron would intentionally subject himself to public ridicule just like in those cheap reality TV shows (writing this, I can still hear the laughter when educated liberal friends talked about the German; with soccer-loving A-lister gays, I'm sure it's extreme revulsion). A minor or a retired athlete surely are at the end of their earning capacity and they are cheaper for the show organizers. They won't shell out big bucks for A-list stars, many of which are closet gay themselves and some of whom are even their campaigners? ("Oh, I support gays though I... uh... am gay myself  actually but I can't possibly come out because that is dumb, you know that, don't you? Coming out is only for the cheap, see?"). Or they just don't want to destroy the investment of their friends because they could do it cheaper on the retirees? (Lesson: bring out more money for a heartier entertainment. Bigger laughs,  most especially from bitter gays who will always be lifted by other "co-victims" joining them in their misery).

With the charlatans, it's all contrived reality shows just so they can hoodwink gays for their darker schemes. Remember gay disease marriage, it was supposed to be a clamor when it turned out only a few simpletons could stomach it.  Some even tried to outlaw gay treatment with the most ridiculous pretenses ("Oh, I would be depressed, I will commit suicide!" To them, Cancer patients should not be treated, they might get depressed and commit suicide). They don't need gays to heal. Gays have a crucial role, they are necessary pawns in their darkest schemes. More below.


Sorry for not writing earlier. As we go deeper into our discussion on the revulsion-based treatment of Homosexual Disease (Therapeutic Homophobia), writing the series has really become "forbidding" at times. I tried to write before Christmas but the triggered revulsion lasted for days and I didn't want to destroy the holiday mood. I won't want to destroy the start of the year either but my friends have been "haranguing" me to write (lol). This is just a short piece, I'll mention a few essentials and reply to a few  questions, but I'll refrain from delving into the revolting stuff (the treatment proper). I will just reframe for now into their proper context what we have been writing so far. We'll continue the Therapy series in the next post (Too early in the year to torture myself, lol).

But really, I'm doing this series for compassion. Sounds corny but it's really a sacrifice fighting my revulsion & all just to bring the light. My sexual conversion just confirmed other anecdotal testimonies of conversion which the charlatanic media chose to ignore because it would destroy their devious game plan. They preferred gays to be ignorant suckers to the contrived mantras of their mercenaries (believe it or not, these fake mantras are the stuff that run the contrived culture wars, another fake one). Well, no need for much counterarguments, they have lost much credibility anyway and the world has really changed. In the US, all the charlatan media are flirting with bankruptcy though they don't have competition, not because of the internet but because nobody respected them enough to continue buying them. Same with the broadcast media: the number 1 shows have 5-6 million viewers and in a country of 330,000,000, that's ridiculous, the whole country has practically tuned off! What we have are smoke & mirrors, reality is missing from the equation. Just like the economy where money printing created the illusions something is moving though the real economy is clueless. The growth is in the graphs but even credible experts are looking for it.

Just like the illusions of gay disease marriage. Who is stupid enough to construct marriage out of a disease when you can just treat the disease? Create smokes of "equality, modernity, bla bla" so that people won't notice they are diseased or that they are stupid? Something hidden behind the smokes and mirrors?

Mostly, I'm saddened at seeing people who repressed their sexuality for too long only to end up repressing their revulsion. My famous British friend Ewan says the majority are either poor, ugly (or plain-looking) or simpletons, the bulwark of democracy, but he's really amazed  how these simple folks could even fantasize they'd achieve some sort of "equality, modernity, etc." if they would only follow "progressive" charlatanic prescriptions like swallowing their vomit, which is what the gays are required to do. And swallow the more simpleton gays did believing that doing so meant they were actually falling in love. Thankfully, only few were that low in the totem pole of simpletons. Yuck, it's yucky times, folks!


A New Year, I'll be on my third year of being a neo-heterosexual soon so let me say Thanks for the Yuck.  Revulsion really works. Somebody asked, so what is the real cure for gays? I thought you should have realized by now. Oh, the real cure are gays themselves. The Charlatans have used the more simple-minded among gays (among other suckers pretending to be "progressives") for their scams in the guise of "liberalism, modernity, equality, bla bla" but they missed the very obvious facts:
1) gays themselves are mostly revolted to each other (that's why, as we have confirmed with the few simpletons everywhere who were "conned" into it, the charlatanic gay disease marriage turned out to be very unpopular  (certified pseudo-clamor) because so few gays really can stomach marrying each other, they are found mostly in the  charlatanic press),
 2) if homosexuals are revolted, what more are heterosexuals so why should you politically blackmail anybody already victimized by their natural revulsion to a revolting stimulus, you want even to legislate against basic human reactions?
 3) since it is so uncomfortable, there's no way it can be normal, nature must have provided a trapdoor, and it turned out, it actually did: Homosexuality  turned out be curable after all (which we have confirmed  personally is actually a fact, so you can just marvel at the ignorance of these supposed developed European countries which created laws that created marriage out of a disease! How developed should you be to be categorized as stupid? They swallowed pretentious charlatanically-prepared "democratic" dogmas fit for suckers just to pretend they were not stupid. Wonder why they are all declining now?). The Peter Principle, reaching the limits of ignorance and arrogance: with the charlatans, gays will be gays forever. But if gays ignored the quacks and used instead their natural gag reflex, they will become neo-heterosexuals. The gay agenda is fake because in the near future when common sense will finally prevail,  Homosexual Disease will just be another reportable disease.

The charlatanic "experts" were only borrowing credibility from the material prosperity around for a particularly lucky period, so when these economic "experts" fell flat on their faces like right now, what guarantee that all the other experts aren't quacks? With our discovery of Therapeutic Homophobia, the point men for the gay agenda were indeed confirmed as quacks. The fake gay agenda is just the punchline to the joke because the act is obviously on its last ropes. It's just following a historical constant- when gay prominence occurs at a particular juncture in history (Biblical, Greek, Roman, etc) , that is the indicator that that particular phase is ending.

Not different with this one.  You can judge how low it has sunk by its gall to equate its basic institutions with disease (you can also see here how weak Western democracy is to any schemer's machinations, the bogus arguments led to the invention of disease-based marriage after all, in supposedly advanced countries at that). They didn't bother looking for the cure because they needed the gays and other "victims"  for their scheme (we have discussed the major schemes in previous posts) .  According to charlatans, that  means freedom. Yes, freedom to become a has-been and irrelevant.


My sexual conversion has been an eye opener, a real gamechanger: I didn't only get a normal heterosexual new me, but as it turned out, I saw the world for what it really was, a world at the mercy of outdated charlatans who manipulate the world for their own dark ends in the guise of "liberalism, progress, modernity" and other pretensions. Surely, it has other objectives because the script feels too contrived, it is bogus. In my early life, I innocently identified as liberal, but I soon learned that was fake as well. There are true liberals & conservatives but they are mostly well-meaning simple people, the sheeps of democracy, but only a few realized the major movements at both sides  are just funded by the same group of charlatan shepherds (we'll take a history lesson in future posts), maintained by a network of charlatanic media which if you are like me who speaks all the major European languages, you'll realize there is actually a chorus across national boundaries singing the same songs & lyrics despite the much-ballyhoed  freedom of the press- and no, its not limited by political ideology as they would like you to believe, it's the same bananas, Left or Right. I was once learning Polish (after learning Japanese early last year, I started learning all the Eastern European languages at the same time) and imagine my surprise when the front page was a pedophile priest in the Dominican Republic. What's that got to do to merit the headline in Poland, you say? We are familiar now with the script.

Having seen how gays were toyed around with fake "progressivism", I already find tedious all these pretensions from the usual suspects. Marx had a very incisive analysis & description of what's wrong with society, but knowing what happens & knowing what to do are two different things. The track record is not encouraging. The Communist experiment in Eastern Europe is a glaring example: they killed tens of millions for nothing, they just developed a productive source of prostitutes & menial manual  laborers for the near-bankrupts of today. The mother of all the social justice pretensions, poverty, is increasing instead everywhere with little prospects of  the previous debt-inflated standard of living ever returning (I doubt if the so-called increase in women working is due to feminism- more likely, it was due to poverty, the wives were forced to seek a second income- and is that even progress?). Feminism, like the gay agenda, were supposed to be the forward forces for the Anti-Patriarchy front, until we blew the whistle the gay problem has nothing to do with Patriarchy or Religion,  the root was more basic- it was due to revulsion. Religion & Patriarchy were mere reactions to the basic problem, not the root. A religious lady, being the gentle soul that she was, can't tell a queen she's revolted at his face, it would be easier to use her religion. Take away her defense & she may die puking at the toilet. Cause of Death: Cardio-Respiratory Arrest Secondary to Severe Dehydration and Electrolyte imbalance due to Severe Revulsion-induced Vomiting.
(The part of the gay agenda in the charlatanic script  is to weaken the delicious masculine standards, allegedly to pull them down to the level of the defeminizing feminists, & you just imagine how unpalatable a world that would be- sexual equivalent of wearing the same limp hospital uniform. Not that it will ever come true, it will be a failure like the other schemes, but just goes to show how the pretentious minds of the charlatan work)

Do they even have figures showing how many are suffering with the revulsion they have unleashed? (Just like they were crowing about how strong was the clamor for Gay Disease Marriage, until we pointed out that, all along, even after a decade, only a few simpletons could stomach it everywhere, and the clamor was actually only found in the charlatanic circles. We'll discuss the actual figures in the next post). As you must have read from my previous posts, I suffered a lot even before I developed bisexual reactions (after which, I took the 4- month therapy which turned me into neo-heterosexual). A year and a half of revolting torture first before I realized I could actually escape. One and a half years of revulsion! True, that eventually so tortured me, my body tried its best to escape homosexuality itself. But I didn't have to suffer, I learned belatedly you could have done that in the clinic anyway if I was just properly informed and not waylaid & used by charlatanic propaganda (now you know why I hate charlatans).

And if I had allowed myself to be blackmailed then, I would be allowing now many to remain prisoners of the same revulsion forever.

The word is prisoners. We are prisoners of these eternal killjoys who have proven themselves grand failures in tinkering with all our lives but they are not about to stop yet- they have to mess around some more because their first pretension on Equality dramatics resulted in the skyrocketing of the 1% while the poor got poorer.Who told them to straitjacket us with pretentious political correctness when they have been toying us from the get-go? Freedom of expression is nice, freedom of sexuality is nicer, but do we really need these clowns to tell us and aggravate our lives? Gays and women have better lives in areas without the mantras of these clowns. We need freedom alright, but freedom from the charlatans. We dont need anybody to pick and choose how we should live our lives- we are capable. Normal, heterosexual, gays, homophobic, Muslim, Christian, Anti-Semitic, racist, Muslim have the same rights.There are no special people, especially when everybody is just waiting for the giant charlatanic bubble of delusion (which got so large because many have gone accustomed deluding themselves,like today) to burst.

How to recognize another A-lister guy?

Lol. Many ways, but usually because of "toilet moments"- that is, when you see an attractive guy, who you thought was straight, only to discover that he's looking right back at you seductively- he's a sister! You'd feel so disgusted then you would want to run to puke to the toilet (wasting time to be attracted to someone only to discover he's lacking drains away much energy). One time, my British friend Ewan told me when he first saw me he got attracted, but when our eyes met, he said he saw the signs so he had his toilet moment. All it took was one second because when an A-lister sees another good-looking man, there will be that split-second he'll admire the vision before his brain could try to crunch the credentials of what he's seeing. If he's a genuine A-lister, he'll soon be immediately disgusted but the split-second was enough to give him away. Ewan is a cross of Roger Moore-Sean Connery so I showed that split-second. But before he could be consumed by the familiar disgust, I told him:"Don't worry I'm sexually allergic to gays too so we could just be friends ". I saw before that he was popular inside that pretentious place and I wanted to have a British acquaintance who matters, and sharing a secret is always a nice way to start a bond (He's not a Scot, Ewan is just a name I gave him here because he told me he had a bigger dick than Ewan McGregor). The unspoken rule: we're both disgusted by the thought of having sex with each other. And since almost all of my A-lister clique started with toilet moments, you can be sure the group is very goodlooking. Needless to say, closet all before, but now, all neo-heterosexuals.

What about the novel?

My novel is a victim of revulsion. I had characters who were supposed to dramatize sexual conversion but they now disgust me. I think I have to remove all the homosexual characters first but I don't have the time right now.

Thoughts on coming out...

This is a moot question because I think there's no need to do it anymore, the disease can be treated.

But before, I actually thought it would have been better for an A-lister gay that gays should come out to lessen the work in deciphering who is fake and who is not. It's really disgusting to desire one only to find out he's gay (Yuck, a toilet moment). But that didn't mean I would have come out (None of my friends came out & good because they have benefitted from Therapeutic Homophobia eventually). Not because one is afraid or all that charlatanic drama. True, it's really embarrassing, but that's not even the reason, because you may be embarrassed of your face but you go out anyway. But: being gay is ONLY enjoyable when a really good-looking STRAIGHT guy agrees to your price, but otherwise, I really don't relish being in a gay community where most of its members you would rather stay away from. Coming out means seeing yourself as a member of a very uncomfortable crowd, and most closet gays realize that fact. You don't hate gays- nobody hates gays, but gays are so uncomfortable most, including gays themselves, actually just don't think about gays- people generally don't want to destroy their day, much less their appetite- but some gays are so drama queens they insist in having a stage, that's why they are mauled. They are mauled in the same way that an unruly drunkard is mauled, not because of sexuality, but because he uses his sexuality to make an ass of himself and everybody else. I actually think anyone should be free to express what he feels- why suffer your revulsion to allow an uncomfortable presence pirouette to his heart's content before you? The only gays I knew who committed suicide were A-listers- they were depressed that the only men who could love them were gays themselves. You really won't expect Kevlarite gays to commit suicide. No, the Kevlarites are tough, all these sensitivity dramas are as fake as their sexual tastes. If they can stomach having sex with each other, they can stomach anything.

 This drama of coming out is supposedly to start debate because nobody knew? Lol, what school or office doesn't have gossips about the sexuality of  one supposedly dubious macho or married man? What man hasn't entered a public urinal without a couple of macho characters ogling at him at the urinal? That presumption of nobody knew was just the drama so they can bring out these pretentious pseudo-arguments, novels, films & programs allegedly "to make people think" and present themselves as capable of thinking. Lol, people are aware normal-looking people can be gay, and I don't see the point why obviously gay athletes should let people who are probably already fighting with their gag reflex be overwhelmed and puke? People can deal with their discomfort if they laugh so gays can be comedians, but you want to spread discomfort when people want to enjoy full-testosterone? These sisters have no respect to other people's rights. Revulsion is not a conscious effort- no use for debate- it's your body saying nobody has a right to aggravate you. I actually condemn these sports drama queens because they are degrading what is delicious. People don't want to see a movie with an ugly star, and I myself don't want to watch a game shouting my heart out with a gay athlete sullying a full-testosterone scene in the soccer field. That's why nobody watches the Gay Games because people have no obligation to suffer just so uncomfortable people can live in their delusion. Pirouette if you want but leave people alone.

But these are outdated arguments. Not that I believe these pretensions would have a major dent anyway, just like in the other charlatanic dramas which just coat the surface, noticed mainly by charlatanic media & their clique (After we have exposed that clamor for Gay Marriage is just a creation of the charlatans, we have other exposures soon). Let the delicious straight men be delicious. Better, be straight yourself. With Therapeutic Homophobia, now, you can.

Shortcut to Therapeutic Homophobia...

From our German friend Heinrich: if you see an attractive man, imagine that his cum is that of a gay man. The shudder of revulsion will be instantaneous. In time, the attraction will be replaced by revulsion. More on this next time.

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

TREATMENT OF HOMOSEXUAL DISEASE: Congratulations, My Neoheterosexual Friends!

By Silvio Merkel 

Part 3. Sexual Healing, not by Nuke, but Puke Power  

1. Revoltingness- capacity to elicit revulsion 
2. A-lister Gays- gays who can't stomach sex with other gays
3. Kevlarite Gays- gays who can eat anything as if they have Kevlar stomachs 
4. Charlatans- read all the post with "Treating" in their title 5. Charlatanic- pertaining to Charlatans 
6. Therapeutic Homophobia- sexual conversion modality based on the natural revoltingness of homosexuals. 
7. False Flag- false event presented as true to serve a certain dark agenda  

This is the third in our series on the treatment of Homosexual Disease. We'll start discussing in detail the treatment here (discuss this with your therapist). A detailed therapeutic session- a guide on how to go about it more formally- is described below. An A-lister homosexual, he who can't stomach sex with other homosexuals, can immediately dive in. But we'll also start suggesting measures on how a Kevlarite can start chipping on their hitherto formidable sexual taste. A more extensive discussion on that will be presented in the last post, the culmination of the series, (the ultimate liberating process which we call "Dekevlarization"). I helped design one for a particular actor which, unknown to him, had all along all the ingredients needed to cure his disease and finally be free from revulsion.

According to quacks: Be happy you're gay because "it's modern anyway". Be honest now, is anybody really happy being gay... forever?

Freedom? You are supposed to be happy because you are free to shout you're gay. Gays have been shouting they were gay for millions of years- but voila! they are still gay. Will political and social change really give meaningful improvement on the lives of gay men? Try transferring a piece of shit over a marble surface and you will see it will still be shit. Try changing the marble into diamond and it will still be shit. What if the shit is the one turned into diamond instead? What if you can actually stop being gay? How about freedom from Homosexual Disease?  

How can one even pretend he's free if his choice is just limited to remaining diseased and abnormal forever?

After all the political pretensions have lost their novelty-just like after the election of a Black president revealed Blacks are still mostly poor, and are getting poorer- the gay man will still be gay. After a few women executives broke the gender ceiling, the vast majority of women will still prefer their traditional roles, and gay will still be gay. Some gay celebrities will earn vast sums of money as charlatanic incentive to come out publicly (so be used politically) but gays will still be gay. A-listers will still puke when seduced by a Kevlarite, and I just pray most Kevlarites will regain sanity earlier or they will get old repressing their revulsion.

 To think, a gay man need not have been gay more than necessary after all. Most times, politics fool you you are getting something, and this one is the biggest con. But small mercies are only for simpletons.

Or was everything just a distraction so as not to see the real, bigger muck? It was a shock, then hilarious, seeing nobody believed the mainstream charlatanic press in the recent Syria WMD sitcom. Welcome to the "cool" Smoke & Mirrors set, baby! It was from these propaganda mouthpieces that you read homosexuality was not a disease and was incurable. Good to know we're not the only ones who recognized the pretensions of these quacks. It's sad, deception and ignorance have become the final currency in these times of normalized decline.

 After I turned neoheterosexual, though I had a far more privileged sex life than most, I was surprised I suddenly felt as if I escaped from hell. Frankly, the present deception on gays is one of the false flags which contributed to the current normalized generalized decline. However, we can see a better future.

 There are game-changing implications of the treatment of Homosexual Disease:

1) The conversion of the homosexual RESPONSE ultimately means homosexuality as a disease can be eliminated, BUT there may be residual abnormal PHYSICAL manifestations in neoheterosexuals so additional therapy is needed for the lisps, the swaying hips & all the other "revolting" stuffs (which we should thank, by the way, because they helped stoke our revulsion which greatly facilitated the therapy from the start).

2) The physical deficits can then be categorized as MERE DISABILITY, an entirely different political animal altogether, thus a lisping neoheterosexual can still be "altruistic" targets by mercenary activists so they have somebody to pretend to help and not lose the propaganda money. But they no longer have to wade into sexual waters where their ignorance has caused great damage. A converted queen with residual feminine manifestations can then become a mere cross-dresser, for example. (But time to chase criminally those activists who gave hormones because they did great damage to people who trusted their compassionate ignorance).

There are already many laws targetting disabled persons, they should only be reinforced. Homosexuality should be declared a public health hazard. This will be apparent as we go deeper in our discussion..


This is true compassion, offering something that solves a problem, not merely cosmetic changes to the sorrounding.

Be forewarned this therapeutic modality is based on revulsion. If you're gay, this will be the most important document in your life. We're still discussing the "Induction of Revulsion Responses", the first part of the Therapeutic Homophobia program.

 This program was based on our analysis of my spontaneous sexual conversion (Please refer to the preceding article). My heightened revulsion to the proliferation of gays in the gym & in beefcake references (the initial triggers) set off a chain of events that, though it tortured me then, accidentally created the conducive circumstances that led to my eventual sexual conversion. Spontaneously. In the beginning, I was aware I became highly revolted but I was totally unaware that I actually became like a highly-charged, highly-volatile atom which zoomed headlong into sexuality-changing reactions. I only realized what was happening when I noted one day that I suddenly developed bisexual reactions. That's the time I sought help from my friends to develop this program and I eventually succeeded in pushing the conversion into complete neo-heterosexualization. We found out that you can duplicate the process on others by artificially creating the situations that could trigger the chain of reactions which lead direct to conversion.

To therapists: The therapy should be tailored to what revolts the patient about gays the most. Some can be more revolted by effeminate gays (like my British friend Ewan), but I was mostly revolted by muscular straight-looking gays (connected to my personality: I hate fakes in everything, including charlatans). What we are discussing here, therefore, is just a guide for the therapist. The important thing is the pathway: the sexual revulsion to a gay man (existing in A-listers, induced in Kevlarites) will be relentlessly stoked to be transformed into a generalized sexual revulsion to all men, all the time centering the focus on the specific target for conversion : the loss of one's sexual attraction to all men. In other words, losing one's homosexual reactions. In short, neo-heterosexualixation.

You can see there the best feature of this program: it is very specific on its aims & effects. No unnecessary collateral aggravation as typical in a charlatanic-designed operation. First, we'll give you a response map of where we're headed.

 BASIC RESPONSE MECHANISMS IN "THERAPEUTIC HOMOPHOBIA' FOR A-LISTERS: Needless to say, when we say "gay" here, it means closet. An A-lister won't have sex with an obvious gay man, not even to openly bisexual or manly gays.

1. High revulsion to gays-

Naturally, this is true of an A-lister and a dekevlarized Kevlarite
For lesbians, the same revulsion spectrum is operative. I talked to woman friends who identify as heterosexual (not bisexual, I was convinced they were straight) but experimented in their youth. They now feel revulsion, mild to severe, when memories of what they did come back to them just by looking at a lesbian. But I'll focus on gay men in this series, it's best to tackle the women separately later because it will be mere research. With the men, it was based on my personal history.

2. Present fear of being fooled into having sex with a gay man.

This greatly reinforces the preexisting generalized feeling of revulsion which automatically kicks into a higher gear when you are confronted by a sexual situation with any man: is he, or isn't he? Yuck, what if he is? Yuck! Bleech!

3. Lingering fear of actually having been fooled in the past into having sex with a gay man- 

I was sure I was never fooled but a dark voice was always insisting I was actually fooled & that greatly heightened the psychic discomfort. The suspicion that I might have swallowed some "toxin" would send sudden shudders of disgust every now & then, unbidden. Sometimes, I actually just vomited, unbidden. Yuck, what if...? Yiiihhh!

3. Generalized doubt that the guy who just attracted you might just be gay 

You start triggering avoidance reactions to sexual situations with a men. Yuck, he's gotta be gay, Yuck!

4. Generalized doubt on the sexuality of all men

Even more avoidance reactions to decrease the psychic pain created by the apprehension of being duped. Oh, they all are gay! Yuck! Bleecchh!

5. Generalized revulsion to all men, intially low-grade to straight men but steadily intensify .

You start losing sexual attraction even to straight men. Early in this phase, you start noticing that women are not mere meat anymore. As your revulsion to straight men increases, you feel a nascent bisexuality growing. I had my first sex encounter with a woman, a trio with another man at this phase, but I still haven't fully realized then that I was already converted into a bisexual. But I eventually did shortly after that, leading to my conference with medical doctor friends who helped me with an intervention program. We became the initial guinea pigs. YUCK YUCK! BLEECCCHHHH!

6. Generalized avoidance of everything sexual about men 

You've lost total sexual attraction to all men. You don't have to be assisted with your erection with a woman here. On the fourth month since the start of my intervention program (after I discovered I was already bisexual), I was sure my homosexual life was past history . No need to say "Yuck" here.

7. Neoheterosexual

 Congratulations! You're dating a girl! (Tips: Play with the naughty one, marry the respectable one! Pretend Cool is just hiding a psychological deficit which will surface sooner or later! )

 It's clear that in the final stage, there was no longer revulsion. It was merely the catalyst. By the time you're healed, your avoidance of anything sexual about men will be automatic, precluding you from ever finding yourself in a revolting situation again. The sexual connections to a man degenerated, atrophied & became fibrotic, redirected by an avoidance reflex that sidestepped the homosexual pathways altogether. You can face a man but no sexual attraction whatsoever. Yes, Homosexual Disease can be healed.

That is my problem in writing this article. I have to dig up all the closed pathways & I actually feel revulsion welling up when writing this so I keep postponing completing it. When I reviewed the initial draft of the series, I found that I rushed writing it to get past the revulsion as soon as possible and I missed out many important things. I'll take my time with the rewrite so as not to miss out anything that might have been shielded by avoidance defense mechanisms somewhere.

We'll clarify some things about the previous post:

 a. I was totally homosexual when the process started. By the time I recognized the spontaneous conversion going on, I was surprised to discover I was already bisexual. By the time it ended, assisted by an artificial intervention in a 4-month period, I was fully heterosexual. Looking back, I can now recall that at the point when I realized I was responding to women, I was already not responding to many good-looking men who attracted me before. This might indicate that sexual response could actually be generated from one anatomical locus, that a bisexual response involves two entities representing two responses that were jammed in a locus intended for one, so not all responses were generated because the excess parts didn't have access to the response pathway. Does this mean there's an anatomic component to sexuality? I'm leaving that to first-rate researchers. To the usual third-rate, don't even dare, you've done enough damage.

b.I wrote before that my friend Greg once had sex with what he thought was straight but only to learn the next day that the guy turned out to be a closet sister. He puked for days, he complained just the thought of the dreaded cum on his tounge jolted his stomach crazy, sending him to violent fits of extreme revulsion. I wrote he was admitted to a hospital for dehydration. I was corrected by his doctor. It was not simple dehydration. The vomiting was so severe there was also electrolyte imbalance which precipitated cardiac arrhythmias at some point. It could have been fatal, all because of a revolting cum..


If you study again my sexual history from a previous post, I was first revolted to a gay boy when I was in kindergarten. The revulsion was reinforced by exposure to my gay barber (the hairdresser of my mother ). For years, I had to be in suspended animation while he cut my hair and I just had to spit out my revulsion afterwards. This clearly means, the earlier the induction of revulsion, the better. This can be artificially triggered, & I believe it should be induced as early as possible. A preventive program can be instituted as early as early childhood. The parent, when he suspects his son may be gay, can start working on inducing the revulsion response early on (e.g. by reinforcing negative impressions on a twirling queen, for instance, making it clear that it was a situation that invited revulsion, etc.). The importance of early induction becomes even greater if the boy would turn out to be a Kevlarite: he can dekevlarize the boy early. Help him develop a revolting response to gay men so that by the time he starts developing sexual interest at adolescence, he would be primed-up for the Therapeutic Homophobia program intervention.

Clearly, no need to wait for the passive development of revulsion and just wish it will appear on its own. Pro-activity is better in all aspects of life, even in sexual conversion. I'll tackle preventive measures more widely in a next post.

 Important: You should be wary of the external influences of gay role models to the child. If he was Kevlarite, turn the gay role model into a false flag- the opposite of what he was, make it clear that the model was actually revolting. The danger is greater if the child was A-lister: he may actually internalize that the revulsion he felt when seeing gay men who were supposed to be in love were the norm, and he would grow up believing that feeling revolted is normal (the bad effect of current gay propaganda, & toxic proof of its ignorance). You can see here that current gay politics is actually dangerous. Ignorance, especially if dressed as expert altruism, is the most dangerous.

The lesson here is abnormal can never be normal. And politics has no place meddling to reinforce abnormal situations, nobody wants the freedom to be abnormal when he could be normal. As very obvious now, nature always provides solutions: if you can't find it, you're a fool, don't even dare to call yourself intellectual much less an activist. Better, a mercenary.

3.  INDUCTION: Jumpstarting Sexual Conversion

 1. Greg-Heinrich Maneuver 
 a. Refer to preceding post for definition

b. SWITCHING ON: The point of attack is the gastrointestinal tract from where all the most aggravating symptoms of revulsion emanate. A part of the revolting stimulus (a gay man, which an A-lister won't otherwise touch sexually with a ten-foot pole) is imagined to have reached the mouth of the patient: it could be the cum, the strongest revulsion inducer, at least, among my friends. Just the thought of gay cum reaching their mouth would send great electric shocks of revulsion to A-listers. To the suscepticle, this could be a switch to take the baseline of revulsion up the roof. This is to jumpstart the simulation of the heigthened revulsion which kicked off a chain of reactions that ultimately led to my sexual conversion. The high level of revulsion should then be sustained by the "Induction of Generalized Homophobia" (see next item).

A Kevlarite can still be helped by this maneuver- the switch to the core of the Dekevlarization process which we'll discuss in the last part. A Kevlarite is expected to have already swallowed a lot of gay cum. An Australian (I mentioned his name somewhere but asked me not to anymore) actually solved the puzzle how to dekevlarize a Kevlarite. That swallowed cum is the key: if you're a Kevlarite, you can still taste it, you can still smell it, right? Not associating the smell & the taste to a particular person, imagine it now in your tounge. Go on... taste... smell... Then look at look at a gay man who mostly revolted you (though they can have sex with some gays , Kevlarites are still revolted by certain type of gays, for obvious reasons). Believe deeply that the cum belongs to him... Believe... then taste it again... Hmmm.... smell it again... What do you feel? Heaven? Or did you feel the shudder? The heave?

But we'll leave that there. There's more. Just a teaser, just to show, even Kevlarites can convert sexually. Meaning, all gays can convert their homosexual reactions.

C. Induced Generalized Homophobia- QE (Quantitative Easing) of Revulsion

After the initial revulsion take-off (initial rocket thrust, if you may, because we are in a lofty journey anyway) with the Greg-Heinrich maneuver, one can maintain the background revulsion through the reinforcements provided by scattered revolting stimuli all around. Political correctness is a big no-no here. Bare your most savage revolted reactions here.

1. If it revolts you, feel it to your bones, grimace, curse, feel the acid in your stomach scour your being, feel the bile welling up your throat, feel the shudder slowly creep, feel it yuckily enveloping into its disgusting arms your whole body... Yihhh... Bleeeechhh...

2. Again, this is the background maintainance of the revulsion, it should be sustained in all the phases of the program. It will only stop when you've developed avoidance reactions to all men (see Reaction Map above). In the next step of the program, we'll tackle the Conversion proper, where we'll discuss the thrust ignitions that will send the revulsion level to the roof as needed (The Conversion Proper is where we calibrate the Sexual Conversion Process).

3. Make a list of the aspects of gays, whom you usually encounter in your daily life, that really revolt you. Whenever you encounter that revolting aspect anytime of the day, focus on the revulsion, feel the disgust it elicited take full effect on you.

Some revolting stimuli that you usually encounter:

 a. On the streets, office: twirling buttocks, sashaying hips, muscular queens, shrieking lisps, deep modulation on a cellphone by a muscleman stealthily staring at your face, an old man in hot pants, a muscular closet man with his arms around his girl but looking hungrily at you, etc.

b. In a gay disco- There is concentrated revulsion here. In fact, a disco can even be used as a thruster of revulsion (Conversion proper) because the concentration of revolting stimuli could really be overpowering at certain hours. Anyway, when the background revulsion lags, it's nice to peep into one. Just hearing the background buzz or smelling the air could give you the revolting buzz, then you get out. But if you're only seeking a background homophobia, don't go at midnight when you might see inebriated muscular queens who are twirling one minute then suddenly kissing each other hungrily the next. That's a guaranteed wallop to your stomach. I actually raced with my British friend Ewan to the toilet to puke. I won. That's the only time I entered a gay disco longer than 5 minutes.

Obviously, there are many more. The hazard of being a blogger: I actually felt revolted just writing the disco scene above.

Just to recapitulate the Induction Phase: we jumpstarted the sexual conversion process by blowing the level of revulsion up the roof, then ensured its level won't slack by making sure that the revolting stimuli that a patient would normally encounter in his daily life will play their part. Needless to say, the patient should refrain from their usual homosexual sex life during the therapy.

I guess you must have realized by now we've found the Holy Grail. We'll discuss Conversion Proper next. Yes, dude, you don't have to be abnormal forever.


 We save the comedy for last.  

(Source: Statistics Netherlands)
2,500 in 2001,
1,800 in 2002,
1,200 in 2004,
1,100 in 2005.

*It tapered off immediately after the third year.
*Just 20 percent of open Dutch homosexual couples are "married", while 80% of the other open gay couples didn't bother. Note: those are only the "open", It doesn't include the closet. I know more closet Dutch than open. It should also be clear that not all couples are sexual: The late Gore Vidal had a so-called lover but he declared publicly they never had sex, and there are many who form couples for non-sexual  companionship.
* 80 percent of heterosexual couples are married
* GOOD NEWS:The charlatans are wrong, gays won't evolve to learn to swallow their revulsion. They regain their sanity instead, as confirmed by the tapering off of the number .

Last week I showed the statistics from the Netherlands that there is actually a tapering off of the number of gay disease marriage there, contrary to the gay propaganda that the young will be "engineered" to act accordingly by propaganda (Do you remember the gay propaganda that the young will follow the revolting software that these ignorant intellectuals will upload to their brains, as if the world is an antiseptic laboratory petri dish where their destructive ignorance will prevail over more sane reality all around?) As expected, they were wrong. The young in 2001 in the Netherlands are now past marrying age- why is there still no rush, it's tapering instead? What's more hilarious is that the hilarity is true in all the ignorant places that adopted the gay disease marriage pseudo-clamor- they have poor demand everywhere in disproportion to the supposed noise which is only present in the charlatanic media anyway (I'll present more complete stats per country next post for more detailed discussion). The most hilarious is France, where after all the political storms & other brouhaha, there were still few takers after all. After we divulged the actual poor demand for this pretend political clamor (a certified false flag) in the last article, the French propaganda machine immediately went into pretense gear: my French friend Yves sent me a LOL message where he brought my attention to the spin by a charlatanic mouthpiece pretending as an intellectual paper (somebody should tell this one it regularly dishes shallow analysis, just reflecting how low the current French intelligentia has become, confirming their decline). The latter spinned the low count as due to gays just being "discrete". Lol! Why, are they also discrete outside France because there are still few takers everywhere... even after a decade?

 Its no surprise, France is in decline. Like the rest of the charlatanic-contaminated bunch. Admit it, the decline is a reflection of intellectual ignorance and deception, both to themselves & to the public. It would have been hilarious were it not so sad.

Saturday, July 27, 2013


Part 2. Sexual Healing, not by Nuke but... PUKE POWER!

By Silvio Merkel

As we mentioned before, all our posts were written under supervision of medical doctors who happened to have been sexually converted themselves. As for using "Silvio" as monicker when the real Silvio has been indicted, I don't consider phony political correctness as filter for my personal idols, that's so outdated. I live in a real world, not in a wannabe utopia.

We will begin a step by step discussion of the management of Homosexual Disease in this post, the second in a series of 5. We will review the scientific literature as we go along and you will be surprised of the "information desert" behind supposedly  hot political issues. If you remember, there was a time when Aids & Cancer were considered incurable. This is the first attempt to document the treatment of Homosexual Disease. Yes, Virginia, it is curable.

This blog has many email ads beside the public one and we didn't have time to reply to all. However, I incorporated the critical points in our discussion.

ATTENTION: Be forewarned we will tackle extreme revulsion as a therapeutic measure.

1. Revoltingness- capacity to elicit revulsion
2. A-lister Gays- gays who can't stomach sex with other gays
3. Kevlarite Gays- gays who can eat anything as if they have Kevlar stomachs
4. Charlatans- read all the post with "Treating" in their title
5. Charlatanic- pertaining to Charlatans
6. Therapeutic Homophobia- sexual conversion modality based on the natural revoltingness of homosexuals.

Most fair-minded gays realize the main problem of homosexuals is their very high capacity to elicit revulsion. Be it a sashay of the hip, a muscle T-shirt, a well-modulated baritone voice or, obviously, a lisp. But we now know,  the natural revoltingness of gays turned out to be their magic weapon which will eventually save them from their disease. It healed me personally. That's the basic principle behind our sexual conversion modality which we now call "Therapeutic Homophobia". Homophobia is a natural reaction to a revolting stimulus and most gays actually feel it themselves.  Lost amidst all the propaganda to push what some activists call as 'gay rights agenda' was the fact that most gays themselves are actually  revolted sexually to other gays. Just a few years back, there's not much debate when one commented negatively why a blatant gay model was unceremoniously mixed in with his all-male porn. The reason was obvious- it's not hard to understand why one should be revolted by a writhing naked gay man in one's own porn collection (I deleted them right away)- but politics suddenly entered the picture and muddled the equation. Can politics turn a revolting factor into a sexy factor? Can politics make the ugly beautiful? Definitely not, so the fact remains, underneath the artificial facade of political correctness, most gays are still revolted sexually to other gays. Like I have always been, like all my A-lister friends still are.

Yes, the revulsion remains, and it will remain because evolution is progressive, not regressive- contrary to the charlatanic delusion that future gays will learn to swallow their revulsion (the proof below). Gag reflex atrophy is regressive, and nature won't allow Gag Reflex to atrophy because the species needs it to guard itself from other revolting stimuli. It just so happened Homophobia was one of the most toxic. But fortunately, there lies salvation- the strong toxicity itself is the cure of Homosexual Disease.

The fact that gays can be converted sexually after all has far-reaching implications. For one, it exposes the dishonest charlatanic machinations that use gullible and mercenary Kevlarite gays for its dark political ends, irregardless of what is good for the gay majority. The fact is, the clamor behind all these political battles on gay disease marriage is a small, puny minority of a minority, which in more intelligent times, should not be worth the social costs and intellectual debasement spent to needlessly kowtow to their pretension. One of the vilest costs is the open insulting of A-lister gays just because the latter are too revolted to invent  interest for all those disease marriage dramas.

Gay Disease Marriage has been on for a decade in the Netherlands  but only 20% of the open Dutch homosexual couples are married. And that is only the open ones, the actual number is far less because the Netherlands, like in all places, has a closet population. As you can see from the table below, after the initial small peak of "marriages", (probably because of the novelty that usually attracts the clueless), it immediately tapered off into a trickle.  For the whole decade, there were only 14,000 gay disease marriage compared to nearly 800,000 heterosexual marriages! 2% of the total! Didn't the gay propaganda say 10% of the population were gay?

(Source: Statistics Netherlands)
2,500 in 2001,
1,800 in 2002,
1,200 in 2004,
1,100 in 2005.

*It tapered off immediately after the third year.
*Just 20 percent of open Dutch homosexual couples are "married", while 80% of the other open gay couples didn't bother. Note: those are only the "open", It doesn't include the closet. I know more closet Dutch than open. It should also be clear that not all couples are sexual: The late Gore Vidal had a so-called lover but he declared publicly they never had sex, and there are many who form couples for non-sexual  companionship.
* 80 percent of heterosexual couples are married
* GOOD NEWS:The charlatans are wrong, gays won't evolve to learn to swallow their revulsion. They regain their sanity instead, as confirmed by the tapering off of the number .

So the big question: If there is a poor demand for gay disease marriage, where are all the political brouhaha coming from?

You guess it, the charlatans. This is not a demand from the majority of gays, it's a contrived demand from the charlatanic media and groups to advance their agenda. They rely on their adage  "they can" (We'll see below why they can). Well, fortunately, events are aligning they won't for long.

The cheapening of a great societal institution like marriage (and I mean heterosexual marriage) is stupid if we only have to kowtow to the caprices of these few mercenaries. I have always ignored this charade because I know homosexuality is a disease and it's bound to be cured like AIDS or Cancer. It was indeed cured. We don't even have to talk about my resentment on the harassment done to drag down my delicate taste.. My greatest reason for reacting was actually compassion, pity. For the life of me, looking at the pictures, it pained me to see how they could even "marry" each other. Seriously, I really cringe thinking how they could even stomach kissing each other! I know, people adapt to the most debasing conditions, like living in stinky slums and they learn to fool themselves they are happy. But we pity them and we intervene to elevate their economic condition. But how about those living in "emotional slums"- those simpletons who concoct icky "marriages" that even make most gays puke. How can you let people live in a way that makes you puke? Yeah, I have a conscience, I can't stand seeing people living repressing their revulsion.

But I don't have to start an NGO to help them, that would be too mercenary. I give them "Therapeutic Homophobia".


It came out almost silly reviewing the scientific literature on sexuality. Coming from a background of intense sexual gratification (more than 600 men, 200 women  and two sexual orientations, exclusive each time, within a 12-year span), I can very well see a lot of it were merely born out of a theoreticians's mind  with, suspiciously, not much actual practical sexual experience to back up its "erudity".  Sexuality is an intellectual marshland- admitted or not, a scientific investigator is not really that much of an authority figure that he could appear out of the blue just like that and suddenly be able to coax you to pour out your innermost sexual secrets to him. You could be selective with your replies, and chances are, judging from the studies, he won't be the wiser.

Curiously, there was almost a total dominance of the straight male worship in the long history of gay pornography but there is a sore lack of credible investigation why that was so (you tend to get more the shallow opinions from pompous characters who rely on their narrow clique-based "reputations" for some measure of credibility). More baffling, the presence of gays who couldn't stomach sex with other gays, doesn't appear prominent in the literature when this group was one of the major historical forces that could explain the abovementioned "curiosity". Denied like the Holocaust? Or prohibited just like the discussion of Holocaust in supposed free European societies? Or just part of the self-delusion because it was much easier to  swallow simplistic "intellectualism" like Patriarchy, etc. than accepting what was disgusting to one's eyes in the mirror?

(In a way, it is really hard to penetrate the bigger part of the homosexual world because it is mostly secret. These third-rate investigators must have realized that they were only working on visible, or coaxable, variables, but unfortunately, they still extracted conclusions from their meager sample, which were then stupidly swallowed by ignorant activists, resulting in contretemps like when this blog resisted the machinations of a few clowns. Feeling empowered by being suckers to  charlatanic schemes, they had the nerve to  politically harass the more delicate to align  to their revolting taste. If they had developed more research on revulsion, they would have known they won't suceed).

There was no clearcut association of vomiting with sex in the literature but there were some reports of complaints of nausea after sex or  nausea born out of an inhibited sex. We thought the scanty data may infer that somehow the circuits of vomiting and sexual desire could overlap. Could the basic mechanism of revulsion to a certain kind of sex be found in those circuits? The meager scientific data means the presence of revulsion doesn't figure in political calculations (that is, assuming independent scientific data, not the charlatanically massaged ones, even figure in political calculations in these times of decline).

The role of revulsion in sex is virgin territory in the scientific literature. Believe it or not.

Revulsion was seen by Charles Darwin as an effort by the species to "immunize" itself from unwanted stimuli. I go further than that: revulsion can be used by the species to heal its diseased sexuality.

I have to admit I actually allowed myself  to be a sucker  at one point, in the spirit of then solidarity, and tried for a time if I could feel something sexual on other gays following the charlatanic script. The effect was reverse: within a week, revulsion got so intense instead that I actually avoided eating in restaurants with obvious gay waiters, a habit which remained up to this day. I avoid gays in anything related to sex or food (actually, in anything which needs intense stimulation of the senses, like music because I can't tolerate gay singers either, but the effect is most acute on food and sex because the two normally stimulate me the most). The food association is more common than you think. Just recently, I attended a small get together of mostly former A-lister friends. One girl brought a gay friend who instantly dominated the conversation talking about sex with his boyfriend (a muscular fairy like him). He was so engrossed he probably didn't notice nobody among those in front of him was eating. I was actually fighting not to throw up. Until the host stood up, apparently to get a big bowl of sauce but he stumbled, splashing the sauce on the fairy. The fairy offered to wash up but the host screamed that he leave quick because the carpet would be messed up. There was no carpet. Then we all finally could eat, silently, but all understood what happened.

The host later told me he did it because he didn't want to embarrass the fairy. He was just about to throw up and that would have been more humiliating.


On a previous post, I wrote that gay prominence has been a consistent indicator for every civilization change in recent history.

Biblical Times-  Gay Prominence- Downfall ( Sodom & Gommorrha)
Ancient Greece-  Gay Prominence- Downfall (Chaeronia)
Roman Times-     Gay Prominence- Downfall
Westerm Civilization- Gay Galore  - Downfall?

I wonder if the persistent signs interpreted by some authors as  "Western decline" are the equivalent of a nascent modern Sodom & Gommorrha.

World's Top Economies 2013

Rank Country Purchasing Power Parity   External Debts
1 United States $15.6 trillion                      $ 16,737,246,099,998
2 China $12.4 trillion                      $      710,700,000,000
3 India $4.8 trillion                        $      390,000,000,000
4 Japan $4.5 trillion                        $   2,719,000,000,000
5 Russia $3.4 trillion                        $      455,200,000,000
6 Germany $3.3 trillion                        $   5,624,000,000,000
7 Brazil $2.4 trillion                        $      405,300,000,000
8 France $2.4 trillion                        $   5,633,000,000,000
9 United Kingdom $2.3 trillion                        $   9,836,000,000,000  
10 Mexico $2.0 trillion                        $     217,700,000,000

Source of PPP data: World Bank
Source of Exterbnal Debt: As compiled by from data of IMF & World Bank

Above is a snapshot of decline.  Reflection of the headlong generalized degradation while the noise for charlatanic modernization was curiously at its height. If they were so successful on their modernization pretension, why were all the indicators pointing south? The political and intellectual decoupling from economic or the poor economic just reflecting the degenerative political and ignorant intellectual? Modernize to decline, the new modern?

 From the destruction arises the Phoenix. More like a duck arising instead. Quack, quack! If it's quack-quack, it means the charlatans were at it again.

If you noticed,  there's a common feature among the countries where the charlatans are most active. Very high external debts. That means these countries are vulnerable to financial manipulations and ultimately control from outside. And it need not be governments. The implication: the more likely the chance that a gay disease marriage is passed in a major country, the weaker the financial footing of that country. Practically a hostage, all for a dark private agenda. Imagine the collateral cost: millions suffering.

The only way out of the decline above is the trick of smoke and mirrors. Create bubbles floating in the air. The trendy European socialistic strangling of the rich discourages them to be creative where their wealth can be held hostage. So they turn destructive and just rely on the financial market where they fall into the thumbs of the charlatans. That's how utopic Europe has become a hostage (lesser for financial heavyweight like Germany). Are they safe? No, because they were only recruited into a bubble. America doesn't have to rely on bubbles, it became rich without them, and no need to be hostage to any quack.

Social democrat haven? Look at Sweden: after progressive legislations to "release the potential" of its people, not only is it losing  Volvo, Saab, etc. but it has become a non-Socialist poodle to run after Assange, etc. Might as well be, comeuppance like they say.

Btw, all those countries are all Christians. Dark agenda, remember?

So what now,  fall of the utopian? There is no counterpart of Utopianism in Asian culture, even in the original Christian religion which is actually Asian to begin with. Can Confucianism eventually take root in Europe? If Christianity, whose morality is same as Confucianism, did it, can another Eastern philosophy do it? The good thing is "utopia" isn't found on the Asian political consciousness. The "charlatanic" (or "utopic" if you may) will lose oxygen in a Confucian landscape. Confucianist "Harmony" or Charlatanic "Equality"?

In Asia, Utopia is a Western conceit. On its pivot to Asia, America is better off seeking Shangrila. There will be less ducks there. They will try but my Singaporean friend said there will be crocodiles at the gate.


How much disgust can we take? Be warned this will be uncomfortable to some. I will discuss the use of revulsion as a treatment modality, and grade the revoltingness accordingly. I will grade this post Grade I, just mild. Next post is Grade 2, and so on, until we reach the Super YUCK! level. The latter is for Dekevlarization, the conversion of a Kevlarite to an A-lister.

Take a deep breath. I assure you, you will thank Homophobia in the end. For therapists who may be curious of the method, I will make this free-flowing. I divided the presentation into three parts: 1) Induction of the Revulsion Response, 2) Conversion Proper, 3) Dekevlarization.

To fully understand our discussion, I suggest you read all the articles with title "Treating Homosexuality" & this series, "Treating Homosexual Disease". The former are mostly disorganized musings but some contain background info on what I'll write here so I will just be very concise. I don't release arguments at the same time because we are fought with counterpropaganda at each turn, & we do this only part-time. Still, we are sure, truth will always eventually prevail.

You'll be surprised Therapeutic Homophobia is more straightforward than the typical management of Psychotic diseases where the therapist has to calibrate different modalities to achieve results and that could take years. Well, you couldn't make political hay out of insane people because they can't be turned into "intellectual" pawns for certain political agenda. (At least, with that, the charlatans have shown they have some glimmer of sense of humor).

In fighting Homosexual Disease, you only need to calibrate your revulsion.

I discovered Therapeutic Homophobia accidentally. About four years ago, we started noting that more and more, gay models were mixed in into the usual beefcake as part of the gay agenda and that turned us off. On one rainy vacation when we were marooned into boredom, we discovered we couldn't even look at the usual beefcake anymore because we weren't sure if they were sisters or not (at this point, I have actually  started thinking all muscular men were sisters unless proven otherwise because of the many muscular gays chasing me in the gym, which so turned me off I built my own home gym). So we developed this blog, originally just to tide over the boredom. But it clicked so we expanded it. It became my sole beefcake reference for a while. But later on, I became conscious that the nascent revulsion to the creeping gay presence just about anywhere won't go away. The then low-grade generalized revulsion started to color my perception of men. After a year, I was sure my revulsion & delight with men have more or less equalized. Then revulsion quickly took over. More and more, the revulsion I initially felt only for gays became high-grade generalized revulsion to all men. When I fully understood what was happening, it suddenly occurred  to me, a spontaneous sexual conversion was actually happening. My only intervention was to make it reach completion.

I opened up to friends, mostly A-lister closet medical doctors and we improvised our program. Initially for our own use, the initial guinea pigs. It only took four more months after my intervention, then I concluded I was free. All are now functioning neoheterosexuals, most with heterosexual families.

The primary question now is how do you develop heterosexual desire? You don't, it just appears along the process. The homosexual desire is a barnacle covering it, and you just remove the barnacle, heterosexual desire will be there. You only need to resuscitate it. The barnacle has no chance with the extreme revulsion ranged against it.

As obvious from above, there really is Spontaneous Sexual Conversion. But I was worried then I might get stuck up to bisexuality only, why not go all the way? It turned out, I could. I did it.


A. THE MAIN REQUIREMENT: High Baseline Revulsion Level

For an A-lister, Homophobia is already very powerful so he already meets the baseline revulsion level to start the therapy.  For a Kevlarite, he has to learn big-size revulsion.

To an A-lister, a gay man is  a sexual non-entity. So an A-lister is only homosexual in the sense that he is only attracted to a presumed or actual straight man. If the presumption is proven wrong, the reaction would be extreme revulsion. You immediately sense here the inadequacy of current homosexual literature. It's primary error was in assuming that the logical parameters for an abnormal sexuality is the same for the normal heterosexual one. That if you are not heterosexual, and you are attracted to the same sex, you should be homosexual and it's only logical that you should hit it up with another homosexual (the basis for all the harassment of A-listers by Kevlarites for their gay disease marriage delusion). But that erroneous presumption on abnormal sexuality is only the first error, there's a series of errors actually, as we'll see in the discussions in this series.

Nature was so designed to perpetuate the species that outside the optimal male-female intercourse, logical rules were discarded. We can see here the problems posed by the presumption that all those who are attracted to the same sex have to act in a prescribed politically correct way. Again, that's the basis for the political harassment of A-lister homosexuals who stuck to what they really felt. So it's clear here that the arguments used to promote marriage based on a diseased sexuality is not concerned with the actual reality of gays, but were only mindful that some gays, obviously Kevlarites, can be used for their political designs.


1. Greg-Heinrich Maneuver-

This is one of the most effective inducers. I wrote before that my friend Greg once had sex with what he thought was straight but he learned the day after that the guy turned out to be a closet sister. Greg loves swallowing so imagine his extreme revulsion when he learned he inadvertently swallowed the hideous cum. He kept puking for days, complaining just  the thought of the icky cum on his tounge sent his gut frantically reverting itself out. He was eventually admitted to a hospital for dehydration.

This incident happened even before this blog opened so I've forgotten it already until an avid German reader reacted on my first post on my new sexual conversion nearly two years ago. He said he could kill his sexual desire to a man just by thinking about the cum of a fairy "sashaying a la can-can singing in a lispy voice" while it glides down his throat. That brought him so strong a revulsion which killed instantly his homosexual desire. To him, the cum of everyman is a fairy's cum, and the revulsion generated alone could stop his arousal immediately (Arousal is the first stage of sexual reaction as I'll explain in the next chapter). Heinrich's was initially just capricious but he became systematic later on in his method until he pronounced he wasn't interested on same-sex sex anymore.

Greg and Heinrich showed the power of a swallowed gay cum to an A-lister. It is a part of the revolting stimulus that you let enter your system. The revulsion generated is so intense it shortcircuits the system.

From my experience with friends, this is consistently one of the strongest inducers- the thought of a gay cum managing to reach their tounge.

2. Induced Generalized Homophobia

Remove political correctness for a while and be conscious of all the revolting aspects of gay men around you. The twirling buttocks. The laugh. The lisp. The big muscles with sashaying hips. Feel, focus alone on the disgust. For an A-lister, the revulsion generated is intensified.

One of the curious aspects of this modality is that the mere intensification of the revulsion actually leads to the same direction- there comes a point it doesn't distinguish the sexual orientation of the subject anymore. A man is simply revolting, the thought of his cum sending revulsion instead of the usual sexual attraction. How? I am only saying the result for now. The fact that it converted some only means the circuits of sexual attraction are not as sacrosanct as presumed. They are manipulable.

More detailed procedures on the induction of Revulsion next on Part 3